Patsgofor4
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2007
- Messages
- 5,842
- Reaction score
- 11,824
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Ty Rex!!! Here we go, baby!!!
Not identical but have striking similarities
While I’m not surprised that you whine constantly Sam, I am surprised that you are willing to brazenly lie about things that you know aren’t true.
WC is a guard and we are selecting a guard at #4 in the hopes that the unlikely happens: that he defies the history of short armed OL and remains a tackle.Peter Skoronski Draft and Combine Prospect Profile | NFL.com
All Combine and Draft-Related Analysis, News, Video, and Biographical Information for Peter Skoronskiwww.nfl.com
This guy started all 33 games at LT in college
Just like WC
Short arms just like WC
Similar size
Drafted by Titans in forst round at 11 to play LT
Guess what happened?
He could not cut it at LT and was moved to guard in first season
Same will happen with WC
Do not draft a guard with 4 th pick
Listen to Dante Scarnechia
This is the key stat - Campbell's wing span is 5-7 inches SHORTER than the other top OT prospects. This is the stat that worries me, NOT his armlength which are fractions of an inch difference with his contemporariesSkoronski has a 79 1/2 in wingspan and Campbells is 77 3/8.
Not sure. Couldn’t find it.What was Matt Light's Wingspan?
Ken, why does wingspan concern you? I don't get that one.This is the key stat - Campbell's wing span is 5-7 inches SHORTER than the other top OT prospects. This is the stat that worries me, NOT his armlength which are fractions of an inch difference with his contemporaries
And while I have been a vocal opponent of picking Campbell at #4, he is a vastly superior athlete over Sikorsky and will probably be an adequate LT starter in the league because of that superior athletic ability. But the fact remains his physical limitation limits his ceiling to the point where I feel he's not worth the #4 pick.
If LT is a must for you, then I would prefer the higher ceiling of Membou who is almost as good an athlete, but has the higher ceiling, with the negative being you'd have to deal with issues that come early one in transitioning from the right side to the left.
So the question becomes, are you drafting a LT to be the long term answer to our OL woes, or are you going to draft him for what we get next year. I believe that Membou, long term, will be the better LT, while Campbell might be better next year.
The wider you are the better. Esp the more you go towards the edge. It allows you to utilize your length as much as possible. You see Campbell play narrow quite a bit bc of his wingspan.Ken, why does wingspan concern you? I don't get that one.
Ken, why does wingspan concern you? I don't get that one.
The only time I can think of needing a better wingspan is when the DL is running a stunt/twist and they need to keep a hand on one guy until the guard latches on, there have several times that I have seen a OT keep a hand on 2 different guys. He will not have his arms straight out to the side, but a limited wingspan could impact that ability that might happen once or twice a gameI can’t imagine an on field application where it would matter. An inch of arm length is a knuckle. Wingspan never comes into play when blocking.
He clearly explained it earlier.Because the media made it up and you should listen to them.
He clearly explained it earlier.
Because it makes it easier for edge players to get their hands on him without him being able to block them first.
I am not going to pretend that I understand the physics of it, but Ken did explain it.
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 4 - April 19 (Through 26yrs)











