- Joined
- Aug 22, 2005
- Messages
- 35,823
- Reaction score
- 27,888
Yeah...Where did you hear he has a no trade clause? Isn't he on a standard rookie deal?
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Yeah...Where did you hear he has a no trade clause? Isn't he on a standard rookie deal?
Players become available in trade, circumstances change.The draft could change significantly, the free agent market isn’t likely to.
Too much noise around the Patriots. It won’t happen.
He is gonna be a Steelers. That’s where he wants to go. 49ers are trying to get everything they can from Pittsburgh.
49ers are using us like Ridley used us.
How does he have a no trade clause, isn’t he on his rookie deal?
I misread it yesterday.Where did you hear he has a no trade clause? Isn't he on a standard rookie deal?
And when they do you will complain about having to trade for them too.Players become available in trade, circumstances change.
I misread it yesterday.
I misread it yesterday.
If camp reports are true, I would prefer the Pats hold their pick and go forward with the young receivers. What this rumor tells me is that the Pats coaching staff may not think the young receivers are doing as well as has been reported. Just a thought
Exactly he as to feed his family.That plays a part but money at the end of the day is the biggest deciding factor.
There are players like Randy Moss, Brandin Cooks or Stefon Diggs that you can trade for and don’t have to pay. They’re playing on their current contract.And when they do you will complain about having to trade for them too.
Cooks?? I want nothing to do with a guy who hurled himself out of a SB.There are players like Randy Moss or Brandin Cooks or Stefon Diggs that you can trade for and don’t have to pay. They’re playing on their current contract.
I’m against trading for a player you also have to pay and make one of the highest paid players in the league. See the difference?
If I have to pay said player I shouldn’t have to give up a first or 2nd, I should pay a 4th, 5th or 6th because the team trading him simply wants to dump salary or can’t afford to pay him.
I misread it yesterday.
Better than Aiyuk…. but sure.Cooks?? I want nothing to do with a guy who hurled himself out of a SB.
Aiyuk would be stupid if he didn't sign long term with his next Team WR's get injured a lot.So he doesn't really have a no trade clause. If a team trades for him, he can't block it. But that team would be stupid to do so without his sign off because without a new contract he's just going to hold out for them instead of the 49ers.
| 64 | 5K |
| 0 | 144 |
| 23 | 2K |
| 193 | 16K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 10 - April 25 (Through 26yrs)











