Patsfan1958
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2017
- Messages
- 6,430
- Reaction score
- 12,533
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.He's been open quite a bit looking at the All 22Called this on Tuesday in the 10/24 thread, figured when they cut Cunningham it'd be to replace him with Reagor since Reagor was out of elevations, and putting Cunningham on the PS again would reset his elevation eligibility counter back to 3. Plus, Bill and BOB just seem to like Reagor in general.
Called this on Tuesday in the 10/24 thread, figured when they cut Cunningham it'd be to replace him with Reagor since Reagor was out of elevations, and putting Cunningham on the PS again would reset his elevation eligibility counter back to 3. Plus, Bill and BOB just seem to like Reagor in general.
Is this a case of a guy finally maturing enough to get with the program and play to his physical potential?
Definitely. He probably should play over Parker eventually since he has actual speed. Parker still has some value, but maybe more as a possession guy on short curl/comeback type routes or toe-tappers on the sideline. Seemed like Parker was more of a package guy last week in short yardage (i.e. in the deep red zone last week) which sounds like a sensible usage.He's been open quite a bit looking at the All 22
Hopefully him and Mac get something going
Possession receivers have to actually catch the ball.Definitely. He probably should play over Parker eventually since he has actual speed. Parker still has some value, but maybe more as a possession guy on short curl/comeback type routes or toe-tappers on the sideline. Seemed like Parker was more of a package guy last week in short yardage (i.e. in the deep red zone last week) which sounds like a sensible usage.
He hasn't been bad catching the ball on shorter routes, it's the middle/deep passes that have been terrible for him. But on passes of less than 15 air yards, at least to my memory, he's been solid.Possession receivers have to actually catch the ball.
He's had a disturbing number of fumbles. Not toooo many drops, but they were seemingly at the worst possible times (like Agholor's 1 drop all season during the end of Cowboys game 2 years ago).Is this a case of a guy finally maturing enough to get with the program and play to his physical potential?
Agholor was not a "bust" in Philly but certainly didn't produce to this draft statusThe thought just occurred to me that the Pats moved from one former Eagles first-round WR bust in 2022 (Agholor, drafted in 2015) to another former Eagles first-round WR bust in 2023 (Reagor, drafted in 2020).
I called this a month ago and was laughed at.Called this on Tuesday in the 10/24 thread, figured when they cut Cunningham it'd be to replace him with Reagor since Reagor was out of elevations, and putting Cunningham on the PS again would reset his elevation eligibility counter back to 3. Plus, Bill and BOB just seem to like Reagor in general.
I called this a month ago and was laughed at.
I feel like I am taking a wait and see approach to this. Could be Jonas Gray or Mike Cloud all over again, too. Don't get me wrong, I would take a couple games like that from Reagor.If Reagor takes on a bigger role over time, it's amazing how different (stylistically) the WR group would be than the one we assumed it would be at the start of camp. Going from Parker, JuJu, Bourne as your top three to Bourne, Douglas, Reagor is a wild shift.
| 10 | 402 |
| 19 | 1K |
| 14 | 610 |
| 3 | 327 |
| 10 | 630 |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 16 - May 1 (Through 26yrs)











