"
I will face the wall and do my urinary best.
1) "Nothing that happened Thursday changed any evaluators opinion of him." First of all, I doubt that. It is their job, after all, to reconsider their views in light of experience. Second you offer no evidence this is so. I made no particular reference to Thursday in my post. They have been observing him in Camp/minicamp for some days now, not just on Thursday. I suppose you might consider that they know more about him than you do and that they might therefore regard him more optimistically than you do.
2) Your second point is a classic example of the straw man, the variant in which you deliberately misrepresent, here by parody, what someone says so that you can debunk your own calculated miscontrual of it. Neither I nor anybody else has asserted anything resembling what you imply. Cunningham is an interesting player whose potential makes him worth keeping. Why you struggle with so modest an assertion is baffling. Perhaps your determination to disagree with your putative lessers is clouding your judgment. As for your accusation of "excitement," I had no idea that emotion is out of place in a sports forum. Maybe I should adopt your more lugubrious and ponderous manner and pose as a more "serious" fan, or maybe I'm just not so desperate for approbation that I would rather look for opportunities to be disagreeable than simply say what I think.
3) The number thing is trivial, of course. I guess that's why you left it for last. He was paid an unusually high amount for a UDFA. That's just a fact, and there was a reason for it.
But so it goes in the testosterone-suffused world of sports chat. You will observe that I p'd a full three-and-a-half feet up the wall. I believe that proves my point.