- Joined
- Jun 17, 2000
- Messages
- 31,238
- Reaction score
- 47,831
My point is they were in every game and could have won a fair number of them. Bad coaching results in double-digit losses where during the game, there was never any shot at winning them. We're fortunate that isn't the case here, which I feel like some people are overlooking, yourself included.I think you could nitpick any team's results from every season. The Patriots very well would have lost to the Cardinals had Murray not blown out his knee on the third play of the game. Tua probably has the Dolphins scoring in the mid-to-high 20's which would have been enough to win that game. The Patriots were that close to an 0-7 finish. Just like had they not made game-crippling mistakes in those 3 losses then they could have won them. Problem is they made those mistakes.
Tampa Bay won 3 games on scores with 9 seconds or less left in the game. If not for those dramatic last second comebacks, they could have finished an embarrassing 5-12 and missed the postseason. They also were a 2-point conversion away from tying two other games late. Could have won those games and finished a more respectable 10-7. But they failed on the 2-point conversions so they lost.
Etc.
You lose games you could have won and you win games you could have lost. But for the most part it evens out and you generally are what your record says you are.
One counterexample to this is the Vikings. Their 4 losses they lost by an average of 22 points per game. Their 1st and 13th wins they won by an average of 16 points. Wins 2-12 (11 games) were all one-score games that they won by an average of 4 points per game. 8 of those 11 wins were 4th quarter comebacks. Here's a team who had pretty much everything go their way which drove their record up by probably a handful of wins. Which is unusual.












