I agree. Jones has no leverage. He'll either not play, or be moved. Belichick would be the last one standing in that situation. Unless he was to tell Kraft otherwise.
If any of this is anything more than speculation, please somebody use it as a springboard. Otherwise, feh, I needed to do something while I processed the statins anyway.
1. (This will not rule the day, but it is a thing): Kraft probably is pro-Mac at heart
Mac is the pick that Kraft didn't hate (the Committee drafted him, he was the shiny no.1 pick of a new draft methodology.)
2. If BB's seat is warm to hot, there is a finite universe of models to offer in the "fix it" continuum.
A. Bill can maintain Mac at QB and blame his own coaching staff hirings/non-hirings. I.e., he can eat crow, go back to the drawing board, and do this like everybody else, giving Patricia the defense, bringing in a QB-whisperer for Jones, go out and find the new Scar, etc.
B. Some variation involving tweaking the scheme and the playbook, etc. etc. etc., but heads not rolling, we appreciate Mac's passion, etc. This would mean attempting to keep the present cast of characters and blaming the SOP binder, in corporate talk.
C. Bill can let Mac be the scapegoat/take the rightful blame. That is, he can ditch Mac NOW and let the press write about why, just say he thinks Zappe gives us the best chance to win
right now. We own Mac's rights, it's up to him to come back into camp and win the job back. I think given his mindset, this is tantamount to writing him off. I am sure Jones believes he is the National Championship Winner From Alabama, pro-bowl rookie, not the 7-7 guy throwing more interceptions than TDs.
D. Bill can say this is an adjustment year, act like it's no big deal, and tinker in the offseason. The "blame" goes into a big pot of "some good things, some bad things, obviously we would have liked some better results..." Then he does whatever work he does behind the scenes, with all the principals in the drama being basically materials to throw into the cauldron. Seat officially goes to hot if he makes no progress, but he probably has enough warning track if he eats crow and tells Kraft he's figuring it out.
If he wants to make option (D) work, he can always point out that basic fundamental lapses of discipline accounted for the Raiders meltdown, cite similar cases, not mention the last minute 10-7 Jete win on the other side, and go with "we're not as bad as our worst game or as good as our best game."
E. Make the last 3 games about chances for Mac to look really good, whether the team wins or loses. Pump up the trade value. Seems very un-Patriotic though.
What this thread really reminds us of is that Mac can "punish" the Pats by sucking, but ultimately BB has the cards.
3. (really an extension of 2C) Mac can be a human shield for BB. If he keeps throwing tantrums he is asking to be traded or just benched. How can Kraft
not back his coach in that scenario? Roll with Zappe, add a vet, and basically make Mac earn the chance to see the field. Ditch the vet if Mac shines in camp.
Only BB knows how much he likes what Patricia/Judge are doing, how much he thinks that aspect really stinks, how much he thinks Mac is just fighting what they want to achieve, etc. ... so as fun as it is to try to figure out, I am once again in observe-speculate-bloviate mode.