PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Patriots Training Camp Tuesday August 9th


Meyers won’t bring back as much as he’ll contribute. In other words, I think playing him in 2022 is worth more than what he’d fetch, as - while I like him as a player - I don’t think he’d get you much in a trade.
if someone else would contribute the same, but they’d not bring back anything and Meyers returns something that’s still a net gain to keep them and get whatever you can for him. And he might bring a decent return, competent NFL receivers do have value and he is one.
 
I'm not sure how many times I have to say that Meyers has one of the fastest 10yd splits on the team (faster than Nixon) for it to register. It's why he can get open underneath. 6.87 3 cone is slightly slower than Nixon's 6.81.
I said he can get open, I also think he’s one of the most instinctual receivers in his ability to find soft spots in zones and get his QB an easy third down conversion.

But he’s slow… that’s the reason his entire team was rooting for him to score his first career TD last year. Once he has the ball in hand, he isn’t fast. I like the guy a lot, unfortunately “like” only goes so far in contract talks.

At some point a player wants more than what a team is willing to give. I’m not sure that’s the case here but one has to wonder why he hasn’t signed a reasonable extension yet.
 
I don't like hot takes but I think Nixon is going to be a very good slot receiver someday. Reporters have said that he looks very good in the slot this camp....better then others. Watch the tape on him there taking reps compared to others. Quick and Smooth.
 
You always say « I’m willing to lose » such n such. Turnover is always happening in the League. The « quick newbz » you mention - they aren’t necessarily any good. Why would we believe Nixon or any of the youngsters will amount to anything ? If they can’t play better than NA, then there is no reason to keep them at all cost.

Meyers won’t bring back as much as he’ll contribute. In other words, I think playing him in 2022 is worth more than what he’d fetch, as - while I like him as a player - I don’t think he’d get you much in a trade.
We’re going to find out where Thornton, Nixon and Wilkerson stand this preseason.

Meyers won’t get too much in trade but it’s better than losing him for nothing. Wilkerson or Nixon could man the slot and possibly be better and cheaper in free agency. Especially if they didn’t wait to extend them once they saw them playing midseason.
 
Also when people say things like "somewhat above league average" they don't understand what they're saying. There's close to 200 WR's in the NFL at any given time during the regular season... a large percentage of them are horrible, far worse than Parker, Agholor, Bourne or Meyers.
There are various systems you can use to quantify such statements. By DYAR and DVOA, Meyers was the 70th best receiver in the league last year. That's either the worst WR2 or the best WR3. The issue with Meyers is that he shouldn't be getting the most targets because he doesn't produce anything like a WR1.
 
Anyways, I’m ok letting Nixon and Wilkerson walk
So if the truth is somewhere between the extremes of "worst WR corps in the league" and "solid depth to at least 6 or 7 NFL-level WRs" - how much true risk is there letting guys like this walk? I just don't see it as the gut wrenching decision some are. The Patriots don't carry seven and sometimes don't even carry six.

No one swooped in a grabbed either off the PS all year, last year and nor do either scream "the next 1200 yd, 9 TD rags to riches story". At best they're fill-in, someone got hurt guys which are most likely either on the Pat's PS (if eligible), someone else's PS (same), or helping out and staying in shape down at their alma mater (or fill in other - "hope I get signed" situation).
 
It might be because he got waived last year.
That’s correct. Both Nixon and Wilkerson are on one year deals but will only be exclusive rights free agents after the season. So if either show anything, they’ll be resigned for 2023 for next to nothing. Both would be restricted free agents after 2023 unless multi-year deals are signed.
 
There are various systems you can use to quantify such statements. By DYAR and DVOA, Meyers was the 70th best receiver in the league last year. That's either the worst WR2 or the best WR3. The issue with Meyers is that he shouldn't be getting the most targets because he doesn't produce anything like a WR1.
I'm the wrong one... IMO analytics are mostly nonsense, it's seeing what predetermined outcome one goes looking for.

Meyers gets the most targets because the slot receiver, TE and 3rd down back have almost always gotten the most looks in this offense... this system emphasizes owning the middle of the field.

Also because he's really good at getting open in the middle of the field. He is big, tall, strong, has great agility for his size and was a former QB in high school, so he understands route running and what QB's want. I love the player, if they sign him to a reasonable extension I'll be good with it. He's a walking third down conversion.

My only concern is he's up for a contract, and I also love the potential of Thornton, Nixon and Wilkerson. Money matters...
 
So if the truth is somewhere between the extremes of "worst WR corps in the league" and "solid depth to at least 6 or 7 NFL-level WRs" - how much true risk is there letting guys like this walk? I just don't see it as the gut wrenching decision some are. The Patriots don't carry seven and sometimes don't even carry six.

No one swooped in a grabbed either off the PS all year, last year and nor do either scream "the next 1200 yd, 9 TD rags to riches story". At best they're fill-in, someone got hurt guys which are most likely either on the Pat's PS (if eligible), someone else's PS (same), or helping out and staying in shape down at their alma mater (or fill in other - "hope I get signed" situation).
We're working under the assumption the team and these young WR's shine in preseason.
 
That’s correct. Both Nixon and Wilkerson are on one year deals but will only be exclusive rights free agents after the season. So if either show anything, they’ll be resigned for 2023 for next to nothing. Both would be restricted free agents after 2023 unless multi-year deals are signed.
The Pats are sitting on the third most cap space in the league (I think) in 2023, they have double digit draft picks... they're loaded with cap, cash and draft capital. If Nixon is explosive in preseason and Wilkerson looks uncoverable in the slot, they can afford to lock both up before their value skyrockets too much.

Nixon might be a flash in the pan, Wilkerson's hands problem may come back to haunt him... either of them or someone else could get hurt. We're just projecting down the road here, but money is not an issue. A lot of teams (Rams, Chiefs, Bucs) have spent their wads with the salary cap rising with a new TV deal, the Pats have held back from spending and are trying to grow through their farm system (rookies). They'll have money to burn.
 
Parker, Agholor, Bourne, Meyers, Thornton, Nixon, Wilkerson...

Now cut two, they won't roster 7 WR's. And before you begin this exercise remember this:

Agholor is making 10 million dollars and has no contract next year. They can open a lot of cap space by trading him. He also has a solid reputation (except here) and despite his contract, he is a reasonable one year rental for a contender who has a WR get injured in preseason.

Meyer's wants a contract for next year and probably thinks he deserves close to the four years 72 million that other slot WR Christian Kirk got... and good god that's a massive overpay. Even if he thinks he doesn't deserve that much, it has to be close, the market has been set.

Also consider this... Thornton, Nixon and Wilkerson are on rookie deals... they cost next to nothing and are locked up for years. Even if they become All Pros, they still will be cheap until their rookie deals run out.

They could carry 6 WR's but probably won't, not unless at least two of them become serious contributors on special teams. A team that can only roster 53 players and only activate 48 players on game day can't have seven guys standing around doing nothing but offense, somebody has to play special teams.

Even if they have more, the most WR's they'll have on the field at a given time is 4 or 5 max... more isn't necessarily better.
I'm hearing good things about Agholor thus far too, and it depends what we can get for him, to me -- though the cap savings would be fine too. I mean, I agree, it's 6 not 7. I wouldn't make the call until all injury information is in prior to the cutdown. Somebody might get injured, or "injured," close to the end of camp.

Heres some pro-con
Agholor - pro: 10M off cap
Con: the sunk cost still pisses me off...pay for Agholor '20, get Agholor '21, when it looks like '20 might be back, trade him in '22...
Con: Trade partner gets to argue this is a sub-500 yard guy. Trade partner has you over a barrel if your motivation is getting the 10m off the books. Goodbye Agholor, hello 6th rounder or whatever.

Meyers: Pro: he's gone in a straight line in the right direction for 3 years. He is valuable to a trade partner, so might bring a higher trade value.
Con: We lose the developing talent.

Bourne: I dont know the cap/contract stuff for Bourne, not looking it up, same basic level as Meyers: reliable guy who didn't have an off year.
talent
A binky, e.g., Wilkerson: Welllllll is he good enough to lose the tried and true talent? I think I know that Thornton sticks. It's also likely the four we usually talk about stick. (Parker, Agholor, Bourne, Meyers.) If so, room for 1 more. Also, LilJordan Humphries just never pops into these conversations.... wtf

I think whoever get the worst minor injury just got an injury promotion and gets stashed, because we need 1 more spot for wideouts at least. I think BB wants to have an unreasonable number of avail. receivers and the season is unreasonably long. Bold prediction: 2 receivers to injured reserve.
 
I'm hearing good things about Agholor thus far too, and it depends what we can get for him, to me -- though the cap savings would be fine too. I mean, I agree, it's 6 not 7. I wouldn't make the call until all injury information is in prior to the cutdown. Somebody might get injured, or "injured," close to the end of camp.
Agreed, wait until the zero hour before making a move. Make sure everyone on this roster is healthy, make sure the kids play to the expectations we're hoping they will. We're just spitballing here, there's certainly no rush.
Heres some pro-con
Agholor - pro: 10M off cap
Con: the sunk cost still pisses me off...pay for Agholor '20, get Agholor '21, when it looks like '20 might be back, trade him in '22...
Con: Trade partner gets to argue this is a sub-500 yard guy. Trade partner has you over a barrel if your motivation is getting the 10m off the books. Goodbye Agholor, hello 6th rounder or whatever.
Agholor caught 900 yards, 8 td's and had the second highest yards per reception in the NFL in 2020... he didn't come to NE and forget how to play, his talent didn't leave him like the levels on a video game. New team, bad blocking, mistake prone football, rookie QB... count the reasons why he had half the production as the previous season, but I guarantee (if healthy) it was neither of those first two reasons. He could put up those numbers (or better) here in 2022 if they play well, he could do it elsewhere if the conditions were right. He has value, the value in trading him is the combination of cap space and a late round pick. Again, same with Jakobi, I like it if they extended either or both of them rather than trade them... assuming the money was reasonable. I just want the five best receivers at the best value.
Meyers: Pro: he's gone in a straight line in the right direction for 3 years. He is valuable to a trade partner, so might bring a higher trade value.
Con: We lose the developing talent.
What's he want for money?
Bourne: I dont know the cap/contract stuff for Bourne, not looking it up, same basic level as Meyers: reliable guy who didn't have an off year.
talent
He's faster than Meyers by at least a tenth of a second, otherwise they could be brothers how similar they are. Bourne plays with a contagious energy, I'd hate to lose that, plus he is reasonably paid through another season (2023).
A binky, e.g., Wilkerson: Welllllll is he good enough to lose the tried and true talent? I think I know that Thornton sticks. It's also likely the four we usually talk about stick. (Parker, Agholor, Bourne, Meyers.) If so, room for 1 more. Also, LilJordan Humphries just never pops into these conversations.... wtf
Wilkerson's is also faster than Meyers by at least a tenth of a second... his agility is unique in a league full of quick people. He has the best shuttle and cone of every WR or RB on the team. No weapon on the team has his ability to break ankles and make DB's lose a cleat trying to change direction with him. He's the same size as Bourne and Meyers but is an inch shorter, his agility is almost as quick as Edelman. Quickness/agility in the slot is more important than top speed, and he's not slow.
I think whoever get the worst minor injury just got an injury promotion and gets stashed, because we need 1 more spot for wideouts at least. I think BB wants to have an unreasonable number of avail. receivers and the season is unreasonably long. Bold prediction: 2 receivers to injured reserve.
I can't/won't predict injuries... bad mojo.

But Nixon and Wilkerson might balk at another practice squad or a Foxboro flu assignment, it might be hard to stash either if the entire NFL sees them put up stats in preseason.
 
I'm the wrong one... IMO analytics are mostly nonsense, it's seeing what predetermined outcome one goes looking for.
Absolutely wrong. Established quantitative systems have no per player or per team bias -- unlike forum posters. I have relied on the Football Outsider system for years, i.e. I didn't pick it to dis Meyers or praise Bourne.
Meyers gets the most targets because the slot receiver, TE and 3rd down back have almost always gotten the most looks in this offense... this system emphasizes owning the middle of the field.
He effectively is used as check down receiver whom Mac went to far to many times last year for negligible meaningful production. The issue I have is not the targets he gets at the position but how little he can do with them. Lots of targets for the worst TD producing WR in league history is a huge waste. Give them to a playmaker. The offense would have been measurably better with more big plays from those targets -- like a Bourne would provide.
Also because he's really good at getting open in the middle of the field. He is big, tall, strong, has great agility for his size and was a former QB in high school, so he understands route running and what QB's want. I love the player, if they sign him to a reasonable extension I'll be good with it. He's a walking third down conversion.
You'd think his lack of YAC wouldn't hurt him as much in the red zone but he completely disappears there because he actually gets covered and can't get open vs man coverage.
My only concern is he's up for a contract, and I also love the potential of Thornton, Nixon and Wilkerson. Money matters...
He's going to want a contract that vastly exceeds his actual value as the 70th best WR in the league. I'd much rather save the cap cost and see one of the kids get those targets.
 
We’re going to find out where Thornton, Nixon and Wilkerson stand this preseason.

Meyers won’t get too much in trade but it’s better than losing him for nothing. Wilkerson or Nixon could man the slot and possibly be better and cheaper in free agency. Especially if they didn’t wait to extend them once they saw them playing midseason.
Wilkerson is and endangered species
 
I don't care how slow Meyers is. He is still one of the most dependable WR's until someone else proves otherwise
He set an NFL record for most receptions to start a career without a TD, so yeah, you can depend on him not to do anything with the ball in his hands and to never be open in the end zone.
 
Absolutely wrong. Established quantitative systems have no per player or per team bias -- unlike forum posters. I have relied on the Football Outsider system for years, i.e. I didn't pick it to dis Meyers or praise Bourne.
Okay, I see a bunch of bookworms justifying a paycheck, but let's agree to disagree. Other people feel the same...

He effectively is used as check down receiver whom Mac went to far to many times last year for negligible meaningful production. The issue I have is not the targets he gets at the position but how little he can do with them. Lots of targets for the worst TD producing WR in league history is a huge waste. Give them to a playmaker. The offense would have been measurably better with more big plays from those targets -- like a Bourne would provide.
Oftentimes he gets the ball because he's open, because time is running out on the QB, because he gets open fast. Last year I don't know who they should have been playing in the slot instead, but he's going to get a lot of targets in the middle of the field and closest in the line of site of the QB. Who they go with in the slot moving forward is anyone's guess, but in 2022 there may be some better options, not so sure about 2021.
You'd think his lack of YAC wouldn't hurt him as much in the red zone but he completely disappears there because he actually gets covered and can't get open vs man coverage.
In short space around the redzone his ability to find a cushion shrinks, and he's not fast enough to beat someone to a spot. He doesn't make a lot of home run plays either, or he gets chased down from behind... he's not winning a foot race.
He's going to want a contract that vastly exceeds his actual value as the 70th best WR in the league. I'd much rather save the cap cost and see one of the kids get those targets.
Let's see, some guys are smart about contracts... others not so much. There's also likely some team willing to throw stupid money at him he can't refuse... in which case good luck.
 
I don't care how slow Meyers is. He is still one of the most dependable WR's until someone else proves otherwise
Agree here...
 


Thursday Patriots Notebook 5/2: News and Notes
Wednesday Patriots Notebook 5/1: News and Notes
TRANSCRIPT: Jerod Mayo’s Appearance on WEEI On Monday
Tuesday Patriots Notebook 4/30: News and Notes
TRANSCRIPT: Drake Maye’s Interview on WEEI on Jones & Mego with Arcand
MORSE: Rookie Camp Invitees and Draft Notes
Patriots Get Extension Done with Barmore
Monday Patriots Notebook 4/29: News and Notes
Patriots News 4-28, Draft Notes On Every Draft Pick
MORSE: A Closer Look at the Patriots Undrafted Free Agents
Back
Top