- Joined
- Dec 9, 2010
- Messages
- 11,524
- Reaction score
- 14,471
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.No you are correctamundo. If you listen to what only the most reliable and plugged-in Pats media have said, its about the injury. He'll be backMy father the conspiracy theorist thinks that this is all about the contract. But to me it seems like it really is about the injury. Am I naïve?
You tell us.Who we putting on Cooper the Dallas game and Evans the Tampa game?
Gotta be fan favorite JJ33Who we putting on Cooper the Dallas game and Evans the Tampa game?
Why would the Pats PUP him if that's the case? Why not just let him sit? Because the 53?Oh Jesus it’s obviously a contract issue. He’ll come off PUP after 6 weeks, “rehab” however many weeks it takes to get to the week you must report to accrue service time, and then he’ll play.
Why would the Pats PUP him if that's the case? Why not just let him sit? Because the 53?
People are just BEGGING for immature replies. You can’t say « big muscle » around me !The contract is not the issue. Hes still recovering from the surgery. A quad is big muscle.
Umm, why do you think Mac was studying the defensive playbook?This smells funny.... 6 games without #1 CB...
Who will be opposite JC ? Wade?
Wade was listed as a 4th team CB in Baltimore, which means he was either their 7th or 8th best. His last year in college painted a similar picture. I think he's on the roster for more long term considerations, which is fine since he's under contract for 4 years at minimum salary.This smells funny.... 6 games without #1 CB...
Who will be opposite JC ? Wade?