Mack Herron
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2006
- Messages
- 16,622
- Reaction score
- 23,643
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.There are very compelling reasons. This is Jones team, the discussion is only when.This starter thing is overrated. The truth is if Cam plays like he did last year, patriots will bench him. They did it last year with Stidham, they won’t hesitate to do it again. (The only reason Stidham or Hoyer did not take the job from Cam last year was that they were awful as well.)
If Cam is playing well and their quarterback play is close (as it appears to be) what’s the downside of having Mac Jones sit and learn instead of having to risk pulling your rookie first round pick out of the game, damaging his confidence. Just seems that there is so much urgency to start Jones and so far there is no compelling reason to do so.
Cam Pipp
No doubt in my mind hes starting by Halloween or sooner.Cam Pipp
He is a rookie in the most complex offenses in the NFL. How long has he been in the patriots system ? He will be the first to tell you that he is still messing up out there and grasping the system is a work in progress. He has played two pre-season games, thats it. His practices by his own accord have been inconsistent. Its not like their play hasn't been close. If this is an argument about why a rookie quarterback should start in week one versus sitting and learning (if he doesn't have to start), am not going to go there. That argument will go on forever...
Why would I be sad when I basically called Mac to the Pats 10 months ago. I'm also unlike you where I'd be rooting for the Pats to win rather than how you proclaimed you know more than Belichick does. Must be ironic for you if Cam lost his job because he shares your views on covid.
One year contract Cam losing confidence is not an equal risk. Mac Jones is a multi millon dollar first round pick, hopefully the future of our franchise.Pulling your QB in the second half of a blowout loss is not the same thing as naming a new starter going into a game. Cam Newton has never been benched for real on the Patriots, and we don't really know what the threshold is for how bad he has to play to make that happen.
I see everyone bring up the confidence aspect for Mac, but I don't really get it. Isn't confidence one of the intangibles we already expected Mac to have which contributed to his draft selection? Who's to say Cam losing confidence isn't an equal risk? Who's to say Mac wouldn't be equally shaken by losing the position battle right now? A good team player should be accepting of whatever his role is during a given play, game, or season. If benching either of our QBs is enough to send them into a career ruining spiral, maybe that just means they weren't going to pan out in the first place.
Not playing Mac out of fear that he might get rattled by a hypothetical benching seems very cowardly and based on more than one assumption that might not even hold. He should be the starter as soon as the staff thinks he's better than Cam for the team.
Looking like Gilmore may not play in pre-season and may not be ready for the start of the season.
If so, Williams and M. Jackson could be competing for a starting role.
"Smarter people than me will make that decision and given the sustained success we have had, I am inclined to trust them." I am with you there !!If we had the version of Alex Smith the Chiefs had when they sat Mahomes for a year, most people around here, despite Mac looking great, would be okay with Smith starting.
The problem is that we have the corpse of Cam Newton. He is a QB that does not fit our system and whose best attributes are not as big an advantage as they used to be. Newton COULD very well do WORSE than a rookie Jones.
Question is:
- How much importance do we put on THIS YEAR versus the long-term development of Mac Jones.
The answer to this question might influence who you start... unless you think the best for both Mac AND the team is to start him ASAP. Which could very well be the case. We know that the Pats are at least considering it. Smarter people than me will make that decision and given the sustained success we have had, I am inclined to trust them.
Exactly. And I do not see how it helps Jones to sit.If we had the version of Alex Smith the Chiefs had when they sat Mahomes for a year, most people around here, despite Mac looking great, would be okay with Smith starting.
The problem is that we have the corpse of Cam Newton. He is a QB that does not fit our system and whose best attributes are not as big an advantage as they used to be. Newton COULD very well do WORSE than a rookie Jones.
Question is:
- How much importance do we put on THIS YEAR versus the long-term development of Mac Jones.
The answer to this question might influence who you start... unless you think the best for both Mac AND the team is to start him ASAP. Which could very well be the case. We know that the Pats are at least considering it. Smarter people than me will make that decision and given the sustained success we have had, I am inclined to trust them.
Who thinks they are smarter than Belichick?This battle has left me really conflicted.
Do I root for the poster who thinks they are smarter than Belichick or the poster who thinks they are smarter than McDaniels...
What does he learn sitting?He is a rookie in the most complex offenses in the NFL. How long has he been in the patriots system ? He will be the first to tell you that he is still messing up out there and grasping the system is a work in progress. He has played two pre-season games, thats it. His practices by his own accord have been inconsistent. Its not like their play hasn't been close. If this is an argument about why a rookie quarterback should start in week one versus sitting and learning (if he doesn't have to start), am not going to go there. That argument will go on forever...
Yeah, I got Labor Day.No doubt in my mind hes starting by Halloween or sooner.
At this point it's entirely possible.Yeah, I got Labor Day.
| 388 | 28K |
| 162 | 12K |
| 7 | 520 |
| 310 | 26K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
May 10 - May 25 (Through 26yrs)










