- Joined
- Mar 15, 2013
- Messages
- 9,152
- Reaction score
- 13,527
I get that, sure - but, as I've said before, if I'm Jimmy, I want to get into a situation where the job is mine to lose (and with some guaranteed money), not one where they're waiting for me to die to begin their sunshine years.No, I mean JAG. The top QB prospects are at different stages of readiness. Shanahan's offense calls for a QB who can stay on script, do a few specific things, and not try to take too much onto himself. A QB like, for example, Lance, may be up to a year or two away from that. So, if you're a decent enough QB (in this case, JAG), you'll have some time to shine with a team that's got a lot of talent. Then, even if you move on after this season, or next, you'll have put some good stuff on tape, and had a chance to have being healthy as something teams remember about your last run with the team.
And just because you have no idea what the 49ers are doing, you make the assumption that Shanahan is flailing, which is dubious, at best. Why?
And I said "flailing" because there is nothing good for SF coming out of that statement. I've already seen the national/Boston writers jumping all over it with comments like: there goes Jimmy's trade value. KS is essentially devaluing one of his assets and very possibly causing hard feelings.
I don't see things as cut and dried "how much are you paying me?" situations. My guess with Jimmy is that he could land a pretty good deal right now. The down side is a fall off the cliff, Trubisky style (if he gets benched for a kid), the upside minimal. Comments like this also reinforce the impatience of the fans he'll be playing before.
There was no reason for KS to phrase it the way he did.












