National Sports Advisors
Rotational Player and Threatening Starter's Job
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2006
- Messages
- 1,020
- Reaction score
- 0
Maybe LSU...although they got beaten by a team BC would kill.
Definately not Oklahoma or Ohio State...are you one of those people who actually believe the perennial "powerhouse" philosophy? Basically, just assume these teams are good because...ah...well, just because!??
c'mon man. USC, Oregon, California, Texas Miami...all these teams are showing us they suck this year. The only fair way to end this debate would be a playoff system. But that's not going to happen....sadly!
Dude, Umass hung tough with BC. You think BC would crush Kentucky? Kentucky beat LSU and yet you think BC would crush Kentucky? Get serious will ya please. BC and Ohio St have been fortunate with easy schedules and a bunch of other teams getting upset. Just because a team gets upset and has a loss or two doesn't mean they aren't better than BC. I'm not saying a one or two loss team should be ranked higher than BC. All I'm saying is that BC will get matched up with an LSU, Oklahoma, Oregon, Florida, or USC in the bowl season and get exposed just like Notre Dame did the last 2 years. Hell, BC struggled with ND and USC went into south bend and completely dominated. Do you honestly believe USC would not be favored against BC on a neutral field? I mean, BC is a nice story, but people are kidding themselves if they think they can hang and bang with the likes of LSU on a neutral field.












