h0c2000
Rotational Player and Threatening Starter's Job
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2006
- Messages
- 1,360
- Reaction score
- 2,382
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Youtubers are the lowest of the low.
I'm not the person to unwind the muddled mind of a conspiracy theorist. I know better than try to get involved.I'm sorry the truth hurts your world view. You click the confused tag quite a bit, but have yet to form any sort of response to anything.
You tubers only have reputation to make a living. If they were so "low", or lying, they would lose their credibility and people would not support them.
But go ahead, keep clicking that confused tag.
I think everyone needs to watch this.
Why listen to real experts when you can listen to a YouTube who did internet research?All these? It’s just hard to take you seriously at this point with claims like this. Your just generalizing now. Neither of the names I mentioned are any of those things. And neither is Tim Pool, who I could really care less about.
Why listen to real experts when you can listen to a YouTube who did internet research?
I'm not the person to unwind the muddled mind of a conspiracy theorist. I know better than try to get involved.
What is a Tim Pool and why should we care what it has to say?
Why listen to real experts when you can listen to a YouTube who did internet research?
I dont watch TV, I also do not care about what media slant exist from either side (no **** they exist, didnt know it was some special code to crack) or care to listen to someone get to the bottom of it, especially if I have to listen to a rant to get to the point. If it was an article I could speed read it and jump to the fragments of information scattered about.So you choose ignorance. Good to know.
Public Opinion on Single-Payer, National Health Plans, and Expanding Access to Medicare Coverage
Speaking of polling... M4A/healthcare figured to be a hot topic anyway but now it will be even hotter because of the coronavirus.
Crazy how the surface level of these polls shows something completely different when you break it down in it’s entirety
I dont watch TV, I also do not care about what media slant exist from either side (no **** they exist, didnt know it was some special code to crack) or care to listen to someone get to the bottom of it, especially if I have to listen to a rant to get to the point. If it was an article I could speed read it and jump to the fragments of information scattered about.
If Im aiming to be informed via youtube, my angle would be something along the lines of (on this particular subject, a doctor):
It's called actual journalism. If you didn't watch it, we have nothing to discuss.
I would refer you to slides 9 & 11 for this poll when people see what is involved they oppose NH plan.
IE you lose your polan and you pay higher taxes.
Wait, I was about to agree with you, but let me clarify: You understand that there is an apparent higher mortality rate when, for example, you only test those with severe systems? And that you have an apparently lower mortality rate, when you begin to test a greater portion of the population?
In other words, the phenomenon is not based on the virus mutating to become milder, at least not so far as we know. We are simply capturing more cases as we test somewhat more broadly.
Or are you saying that the virus literally becomes more mild "the more infectious it is"? (It is just as infectious, by my reckoning, and just as deadly; we're just observing apparent changes because the tested population has increased.)
It’s still not a virus that kills young or healthy people like the Spanish flu did. Even if 25% of the population caught it like the Spanish flu it’s not as bad as the Spanish flu.
isn’t the comparison pretty useless? The Spanish flu was 100 years ago
I started the video, just for ****s and giggles. It began with Pool stating: “According to the New York Post, Donald Trump’s policies will be vindicated in the wake of the Coronavirus. I agree. But I’ll go one step further: Donald Trump’s policies have already been vindicated.”
This isn’t journalism, this is low-rent Trumpist fanfic. It’s unfortunate you can’t tell the difference.
Rich sample size and killer sampling error...
I started the video, just for ****s and giggles. It began with Pool stating: “According to the New York Post, Donald Trump’s policies will be vindicated in the wake of the Coronavirus. I agree. But I’ll go one step further: Donald Trump’s policies have already been vindicated.”
This isn’t journalism, this is low-rent Trumpist fanfic. It’s unfortunate you can’t tell the difference.
As opposed to the Bezos owned WaPo?
How much does Amazon's businesses rely on good from China.
You mean "This doesn't line up with my politics so I will automatically dismiss all of it and make fun of people, rather than absorb all the material and form an articulate, factual analysis."
That's what I figured. You didn't let me down.