Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.
I’ll troll people either way. I’ll troll with you ease 24/7. But Jerry Jones ain’t my kind of owner. I don’t it like when owners decide to get involved in the football operations too heavily. You, on the other hand? You seem to be a big fan. Maybe the next time you decide to take a sabbatical from here for a couple of months after a tough loss, you can try jumping on that bandwagon. That’s an owner that’s perfected interfering with football operations while Kraft is only beginning to dip his toe back in.My pleasure, I’ll be here all week! I know you are a big fan of irony - What was the post you had the other day about trolling so hard if the Pats signed AB?
He has been. He wasn’t when he first got here and he just reportedly made the decision on Brown himself. Combined with his age and how many, uh, situations, he’s found himself in since Spygate broke, those don’t seem like good signs for things to come. I want Kraft to sit back and enjoy the games. Kraft stuck his nose in on the football operations side and there’s been nothing reported to dispute that. There’s been no behavior from the guy he cut (such as insulting BB on social media) to dispute that. You loved that move. That’s fine. That’s why the post was so hilariously ironic. The knock on Jerry is that he interferes too much with the football operations. You liked it when Kraft did it and you’ll probably like it when Kraft eventually does it again. Therefore, Jones seems to be more your speed as an owner. Not mine.Such a powerful man, trolling on the internet!
Actually I enjoy the back and forth with you.
RKK is the anti Jerry and it’s obvious. The master-slave relationship Jones has with Garrett is as diametrically opposite to that of Kraft - Belichick as their respective organization records over the past quarter century.
We are blessed!
.
He isn’t. The problem is that, after seemingly learning his lesson after hiring BB and sitting back for years while BB ran the show, he meddled. Those of us against an owner meddling have cited that as one of the biggest reasons why we are, and have been, critical. Therefore, you saying that Jerry is the right owner for us is comically ironic. You liked Kraft meddling. You’ve supported Kraft meddling. You’ve made hundreds of posts since Brown was released supporting the meddling. The meddling owner seems to be much more up your alley than our’s.Will agree to disagree.
If you you think Bob Kraft is ANYWHERE NEAR the meddling owner that Jerry Jones is, then God Bless Ya!!!!!!
.
This should be the most disliked post in forum history.
Saying I feel sorry for Jets, Colts, Ravens or Chiefs fans would be far worse
We once had a whole thread, in 2008, where people were honestly arguing that Matt Cassel should remain as starting QB, after TB12 rehabbed his ACL tear.
Pending legal action. The Pats already had him under contract and should have forced the league’s hand to put him on the exempt list. They didn’t even wait. But let’s not pretend like this had everything to do with Brown and nothing to do with Kraft. Kraft merely didn’t like his own little $13 tuggy case being brought up. And nothing that you’re saying here disputes the reports that he directly meddled in the football operations side of the team. I’m to assume that you support that sort of thing as well?
I don't support Kraft meddling, but I'm dubious he did. I expect he and Belichick talked it over. I think if Belichick seriously objected, he'd be out of here.
BB would be in violation of his contract if that were the case and probably wouldn’t leave after just one instance. He doesn’t seem like a quitter. And, again, there is nothing to dispute that Kraft made that decision. If BB had anything to do with it, Brown isn’t the type of guy to hold back on social media. He’d have gotten verbally blasted, too. But in this case it is just Kraft that he blasted. You’re welcome to offer up more reasons for why that would be the case. I’ve asked that question multiple times and have yet to get anything that makes logical sense as an answer. So yeah... you’re good with a meddling owner as long as it’s something you want.
