This is the kind of moron we always seem to end up arguing with

[Fixit]

From the comments section after an article about a poll of NFL players in which Brady is chosen by almost a 2-1 margin over Manning as the QB (other than their own) they'd most like to play with : http://www.sportsline.com/nfl/story/10404022

I am not shocked because Brady is having an awesome year. But I don't agree with it. Manning is good no matter what. Brady needs good recievers. Manning just needs guys who can run and catch decently. Manning makes people good. While Brady is part of a system, Manning is the system. Brady strives under this system. But the system strives under Manning.

This is why smart people should just not even bother arguing with the idiots who seem to gravitate to this place.

 

[5 Rings for Brady!!]

Brady did more with less, he can do more with the same and he can do more with more than Mannchoke.

Manning has had exactly one good half of play against us in the playoffs. Let's not get too excited.

 

[patsox23]

From the comments section after an article about a poll of NFL players in which Brady is chosen by almost a 2-1 margin over Manning as the QB (other than their own) they'd most like to play with : http://www.sportsline.com/nfl/story/10404022

I am not shocked because Brady is having an awesome year. But I don't agree with it. Manning is good no matter what. Brady needs good recievers. Manning just needs guys who can run and catch decently. Manning makes people good. While Brady is part of a system, Manning is the system. Brady strives under this system. But the system strives under Manning.

That's hilariously insane.

 

[fair catch fryar]

Brady did more with less, he can do more with the same and he can do more with more than Mannchoke.

Manning has had exactly one good half of play against us in the playoffs. Let's not get too excited.

Manning is great, Brady is great! Personally I'd take Brady over Manning, but this whole argument is pretty lame at this point. That guy sounds like a total idiot!

 

[Wildo7]

I think the NFL players might have a slightly better insight than this clown

 

[patological]

do you know the hallmark of the second - rater? It's resentment of another man's achievement. Thanks for that Rand.

 

[Double G]

"Manning just needs guys that can run and catch decently"

So Wayne, Harrison and Clark are just guys that can run and catch decently; what an insult to those three players.

What a moron.

 

[Tunescribe]

Well, I agree that without a football, Brady would suck. Heck, the whole offense would be worthless and BB wouldn't have a clue.

 

[Real World]

Did that ****** see our recievers last year? Has he ever heard of Fred Coleman? Hmmm...Marvin Harrison & Reggie Wayne versus Reche Caldwell and Doug Gabriel. Man, Brady sure did have it good!

 

[FirstAndGoal]

I'm surprised at the margin among players in favor of Brady. I would have thought it would be closer to 50%

 

[FlyingElvis75]

Brady strives under this system. But the system strives under Manning.

Did he mean "thrives"? Maybe he has a lisp and thinks "s" = "th"?

Anyway, the dude can have whatever opinion he wants. Obviously most people who actually get paid to play/coach football don't agree, so his opinion isn't worth much. It's an anonymous, random poll, which is about as scientific as it gets.

 

[Jacky Roberts]

From the comments section after an article about a poll of NFL players in which Brady is chosen by almost a 2-1 margin over Manning as the QB (other than their own) they'd most like to play with : http://www.sportsline.com/nfl/story/10404022

I am not shocked because Brady is having an awesome year. But I don't agree with it. Manning is good no matter what. Brady needs good recievers. Manning just needs guys who can run and catch decently. Manning makes people good. While Brady is part of a system, Manning is the system. Brady strives under this system. But the system strives under Manning.

This is why smart people should just not even bother arguing with the idiots who seem to gravitate to this place.

Huh? Please tell me this is a joke. NO ONE is that stupid...

 

[ALP]

Huh? Please tell me this is a joke. NO ONE is that stupid...

I would love to tell u that...but i think i would be lying...some WAS that stupid...
u must be kiding me...brady cant do anything with less? thats rit, cuz u know, he had Moss, TO and johnson when he won those 3 sb's...

and manning has OK recievers? uh-huh...yea...rit...who wrote this?

 

[frankiesfly]

Did that ****** see our recievers last year? Has he ever heard of Fred Coleman? Hmmm...Marvin Harrison & Reggie Wayne versus Reche Caldwell and Doug Gabriel. Man, Brady sure did have it good!

LOL. Right.

 

[PatsWickedPissah]

I'm surprised at the margin among players in favor of Brady. I would have thought it would be closer to 50%

No
Brady rarely screams theatrically at his receivers like Manning often does.
Who wants to look like a doofus on national TV?

 

[jaytyme]

OM ***!@#$ God, this idiot seems to think that throwing to caldwell is easier than thowing to harrison and wayne. I wish there could be an Indy thread with an IQ higher than......Deliverence

 

[ALP]

yup, cuz u know...manning would switch recievers and get caldwell and gafney and gabriel, instead of harrison, wayne and gonzalez in a heartbeat...OWWW

 

[jays52]

I'm surprised at the margin among players in favor of Brady. I would have thought it would be closer to 50%

Ballers recognize ballers. Tom is the definition of a baller, Manning is the definition of a numbers guy. As much as I hate the Yankees, it's like comparing A-Rod to 1999 Derek Jeter.

 

[ctpatsfan77]

I'm not sure which is more moronic . . . that "Brady needs good receivers" post, or the idea that "Stop the run and make Tom Brady beat you" is an optimal strategy. . . .

 

[BB_dynasty]

Well, I would take the word of the players over any announcer/fan. This ends the debate for me.
They are both great, why can't people accept it?