PatsBoy12
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2009
- Messages
- 16,502
- Reaction score
- 10,026
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.He is not leading NO to consistent winning.Wow, Bridgewater got blasted!!!
How much of it is him and how much of it is the OL? I haven't been watching consistently because I'm also watching KC/OAK.He is not leading NO to consistent winning.
Bit of both, obv, but I dunno if I’m ready to ride the BW Train any time soon.How much of it is him and how much of it is the OL? I haven't been watching consistently because I'm also watching KC/OAK.
Even in the games they lost, they still lost those games 40-43, 51-54, 28-29 and 31-38.
No one has been able to have a dominating victory over him yet. Every game has been a nail biter aside from maybe the Seattle game last year.
He makes his gaffes, but then makes up for it by striking 3 straight TD’s without blinking.
Even in the games they lost, they still lost those games 40-43, 51-54, 28-29 and 31-38.
No one has been able to have a dominating victory over him yet. Every game has been a nail biter aside from maybe the Seattle game last year.
He makes his gaffes, but then makes up for it by striking 3 straight TD’s without blinking.
Bridgewater is pretty good, but have never seen this star potential people claim he has.
Isn't Gruden supposed to be an offensive coach? How is it that OAK only has 10 points on the board against a KC defense that's supposed to be average at best?
Gotcha. I know nothing about their roster really. I guess that makes it understandable.Because they have one of if not the youngest teams in the league? I'm surprised how competitive they have been through two weeks I thought they would be Miami-esq...well not quite that bad because Miami is historical...80's Tampa type level.
Gotcha. I know nothing about their roster really. I guess that makes it understandable.