manxman2601
PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2011
- Messages
- 39,903
- Reaction score
- 45,464
He got a late start on the draft, so he just decided to follow the PatsFans draft forum instead.
19-0 next year then.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.He got a late start on the draft, so he just decided to follow the PatsFans draft forum instead.
I’m sorry but that’s ****in stoopid
Three happiest boys of the Draft
1. Baker
2. Shaq joining brother Shaq
3. Falk inheriting Tommy's #199
Oluokun would have been interesting.
Luke Falk going at 199. Lol
This one is absolutely infuriating, I mean honestly, why not take a shot at Falk at 198 ? It can’t hurt your bottom line cap wise, and how can having 8,346 seventh round picks really help you. Falk obviously has some talent, and most likely makes your team, as opposed to the 8,346 seventh round picks (or any other 6th round pick at slot 198).
All joking aside, Falk would’ve made the Pats, and how does having so many 7th round picks help your team ? Even if Falk doesn’t make your team, big deal, he was pick 198.
This truly was an embarrassing move, with no reason to bypass Falk at this point in the draft, no sugar coating it. And I’m sorry, if you disagree that it’s an embarrassment not taking a chance at pick 198 with Falk, you’re a moron.
This one is absolutely infuriating, I mean honestly, why not take a shot at Falk at 198 ? It can’t hurt your bottom line cap wise, and how can having 8,346 seventh round picks really help you. Falk obviously has some talent, and most likely makes your team, as opposed to the 8,346 seventh round picks (or any other 6th round pick at slot 198).
All joking aside, Falk would’ve made the Pats, and how does having so many 7th round picks help your team ? Even if Falk doesn’t make your team, big deal, he was pick 198.
This truly was an embarrassing move, with no reason to bypass Falk at this point in the draft, no sugar coating it. And I’m sorry, if you disagree that it’s an embarrassment not taking a chance at pick 198 with Falk, you’re a moron.
This one is absolutely infuriating, I mean honestly, why not take a shot at Falk at 198 ? It can’t hurt your bottom line cap wise, and how can having 8,346 seventh round picks really help you. Falk obviously has some talent, and most likely makes your team, as opposed to the 8,346 seventh round picks (or any other 6th round pick at slot 198).
All joking aside, Falk would’ve made the Pats, and how does having so many 7th round picks help your team ? Even if Falk doesn’t make your team, big deal, he was pick 198.
This truly was an embarrassing move, with no reason to bypass Falk at this point in the draft, no sugar coating it. And I’m sorry, if you disagree that it’s an embarrassment not taking a chance at pick 198 with Falk, you’re a moron.
The guy has been passed on 198 times in 3 days. The Pats have taken a couple of practice squad type LB's over him.
At some point, one would think, that fans might get the idea that he Pats just aren't interested of some of these guys
I also don't think it's a slam dunk that a marginal QB prospect would have been guaranteed a roster spot the way you claim. Hoyer has a lock on #2 and the chance of a #3 QB making the roster who is purely developmental and probably has similar talent than a number of practice squad and waiver wire castoff guys the Pats could pick up in August is pretty slim
Of course you know this for sure Mr. time traveler.Truly disgusting they missed out on a guy who will very likely be out of the league within a year or two after coming from a Mike Leach system
Could you not have said the same then Patriots selected Tom Brady in the 6th round?
| 13 | 759 |
| 5 | 1K |
| 10 | 2K |
| 11 | 2K |
| 11 | 1K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 3 - April 18 (Through 26yrs)











