HawaiianPatsfan
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2014
- Messages
- 922
- Reaction score
- 869
Hugh Jackson hugged Sam Darnold after today's USC pro day. It sounds as if he'll be the number 1 pick.
poor guy
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Hugh Jackson hugged Sam Darnold after today's USC pro day. It sounds as if he'll be the number 1 pick.
Makes sense. It is more likely than not that Gronk will play his final year in NE this season. An extension will be way too expensive especially given his injury issues and trading him a year before the contract expires could still bring in a nice package.
Or he’s getting dealt on or before draft day. Don’t rule it out.
In his article yesterday, Ryan Hannable hypothesized that as a possibility.Or he’s getting dealt on or before draft day. Don’t rule it out.
The main reason I dont see this happening is because it would create a gigantic hole on offense. TE is one of the hardest positions to project in terms of draft. You dont just go out, draft a TE early and assume that he will contribute in his rookie year. Those players need time to absorb not only the skill position playbook but also understand their pass protection assignments. And to be physically proficient in pass-pro they also need to go through a NFL-level strength and conditioning program for a while.
That being said given the right offer anyone is tradeable, obviously.
That's part of why I think there's a possibility he may get dealt. He is at his peak in value.
If you have a healthy Bennett and you can pick the guy you think is the top TE in the draft the Pats are still worse at TE than with Gronk but they still above average. Offense is still top-5 with JE coming back. Because of the scarcity at TE that you mentioned, Gronk would have to fetch a nice haul of draft picks to make it worthwhile.
All other teams have to do is wait until Gronk ticks off Belichick enough.That's part of why I think there's a possibility he may get dealt. He is at his peak in value.
If you have a healthy Bennett and you can pick the guy you think is the top TE in the draft the Pats are still worse at TE than with Gronk but they still above average. Offense is still top-5 with JE coming back. Because of the scarcity at TE that you mentioned, Gronk would have to fetch a nice haul of draft picks to make it worthwhile.
I was going to start a thread about possibly trading Gronk. If he truly wants to retire or is just unhappy not being “free” like Amendola, maybe trade him to the highest bidder. At this point with the injury history and now a possible locker room issue. He’s not worth the trouble or 12 mill a year, let someone else deal with it.Makes sense. It is more likely than not that Gronk will play his final year in NE this season. An extension will be way too expensive especially given his injury issues and trading him a year before the contract expires could still bring in a nice package.
Of course that most probably only happens if there is a somewhat talented TE on the roster behind him. And Hollister or Allen are definitely not that.
Gronk would have to fetch a nice haul of draft picks to make it worthwhile.
Or he’s getting dealt on or before draft day. Don’t rule it out.
The NYG-TBY deal for JPP might be a template for any trade of Gronk. Given Gronk's most recent season of production, such a deal might involve the Pats getting a 2nd-rounder and exchange of 3rd-rounders.
Dude, nobody cares. Does every irrelevant transaction and visit need to be included in this thread?