chumpchange
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2010
- Messages
- 716
- Reaction score
- 677
He's only here because he lucked into Tom Brady.
His record is 19-19 in New England without Tom.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.He's only here because he lucked into Tom Brady.
If you think this will go away as easily as Milloy, you need to put down the pipe.
At the end of the day pride got in the way of our HC’s clear mind.
The team deserved better - The offsense deserved better - Tom definitely deserves better.
I don’t like to believe anything I read but I feel Tom avoiding Matt P’s arm before the press conferences tells a tale.
I love Brady I love this team I hope number 6 is not far away
Apples to Oranges.
The defense lost it for them and they were handicapped by their coach.
We DID hear from Butler. He seemed to say he thought it was performance related.
“They gave up on me. [Expletive]. It is what it is,” Butler told them. “I don’t know what it was. I guess I wasn’t playing good or they didn’t feel comfortable.”
‘I could have changed that game,’ says benched Malcolm Butler - The Boston Globe
Which is why I am convinced that it is some discipline/behavior-related thing.
If it really was just football, then there is no reason for Belichick and Patricia to not go "what the hell - nothing's working, so let's try Butler in there. It can't get any worse." After all, that was basically why Butler got in the game in SB49! The plan and packages did not have Butler playing. But what they did have wasn't working so they tried him.
But the fact that they wouldn't put him in for even a single snap, even when Chung had to miss snaps, tells me there was something more than just football-related going on.
If you think this will go away as easily as Milloy, you need to put down the pipe.
I didn't see any Patriots defensive players around Brady when he was sacked.
Yes, if Tom had only been 100% perfect instead of just historically great at 505 yards and 3 TDs against one of the top defenses in the league, we wouldn't have needed any defense at all. (Which is basically what we had.)
I think those who don’t believe in Bill Belichick after he has led them to 8 Super Bowl’s should find another team to root for, if for no other reason than they are too f.cking stupid to root for this one.
Don’t let the door hit you on the ass on your out.
His career isn't all in New England.His record is 19-19 in New England without Tom.
Again the fans are not the issue. When you have someone like Ninkovich openly criticizing BB, it should be a red flag.I think those who don’t believe in Bill Belichick after he has led them to 8 Super Bowl’s should find another team to root for, if for no other reason than they are too f.cking stupid to root for this one.
Don’t let the door hit you on the ass on your out.
Brady should never have been in a position where he needed to win the game on that drive after already breaking the record for most yards in a Super Bowl, going 3TD 0INT and leading his team to 33 points.I didn't see any Patriots defensive players around Brady when he was sacked.
Again the fans are not the issue. When you have someone like Ninkovich openly criticizing BB, it should be a red flag.
Brady should never have been in a position where he needed to win the game on that drive after already breaking the record for most yards in a Super Bowl, going 3TD 0INT and leading his team to 33 points.
Brady should never have been in a position where he needed to win the game on that drive after already breaking the record for most yards in a Super Bowl, going 3TD 0INT and leading his team to 33 points.
I didn't say anything about Brady. Obviously I was talking about the blocking, or lack there of, on that play.
StrawmanAny fan who thinksBelichick is a JAG coach is a f.cking moron.
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 2 - April 17 (Through 26yrs)











