Okay then it's not worth arguing with someone who dug their feet in the sand this much.
I haven’t dug my heels in the sand at all. I’m looking at the facts. Kraft himself supports my view with his own words. The only difference is he thinks what he did is fine because “the 31” in his view SHOULD BE more important than the patriots and I disagree.
If you want to agree with him on that then there is no debate we just disagree on the objective.
The people that were effected most haven't said anything that wasn't positive about Kraft and both of them still remain employed by him despite being regarded as the best in their field and could play for any team in the league they wanted.
People stay employed for people and don’t publicly trash them despite feeling theyvlet them down. Happens all the time. I still work here so therefore my employer is perfect is a ridiculous conclusion.
Yet somehow an owner who legitimately will go down as one of the best ever and who brought his franchise near immediate an unprecedented success upon arrival is a terrible owner.
Well this is the debate isn’t it.
I disagree that he is the person responsible for the success. I disagree there was a high level of success before belichick. I think any owner hiring belichick and leaving him alone would have the same on field success and must would not have turned their back on the franchise for the sake of the 31.
Have fun ranting while history and reality ignore you because you are too salty that a billionaire surrounded by more qualified people than yourself decided not to take a course of action that most people deemed futile.
What does who is surrounded by have to do with anything.
There isn’t a debate any more about whether it would be futile or not. Kraft himself said it wasn’t about whether he could succeed it was about what is best for the 31.
Why are you making excuses that he isn’t?
You either agree he should do what’s best for the 31 or think he should have done what’s best for the franchise.
The fact that you have to make excuses to make it seem like he had a different reason tells me a lot.
Can ask though? Did it sting a little bit watching the last Super Bowl win and seeing the first person being handed the trophy the owner you think is irrelevant outside of one hire?
What?
Why would winning a SB sting?
When did I say he was irrelevant. I said hiring BB is the reason for the on field success and his spygate and deflategate handling, and his belief that the 31 are more important than the 1, make him a net negative rating in my view as an owner, aside from the BB decision.
Was it a bit of gut punch watching B.B. and Brady hugging him and celebrating with him over it?
Nope loved it. Very happy they could overcome the issues he chose not to handle.
Weird how you have this crazy disdain for him while the people he sold out according to you don't seem to have that issue.
That is in your crazed mind I’m afraid.
Judging him and his actions fairly based on facts is not having disdain.
It’s saying he let the franchise down. He knows that himself but he feels a bigger obligation to the 31.
What is it with you? Can you not see the flaws in what someone does without thinking that means you have to hate them?