- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 56,481
- Reaction score
- 28,233
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Suh was garbage in Detroit, that’s why they didn’t attempt to keep him.
Your comments about Seymour are among the most ignorant I’ve seen in years.
He didn’t the poster is an idiot.
I think he’d be like a hybrid Seymour-Wilfork InfiniTron. Would be to DL what LT was to LB. If he listened. And then he’d have left in a contract dispute, but it’d have been a great 4-5 years.He'll be 31 and can't imagine another team forking over big bucks for him.
I wonder what his career trajectory would have been if when he was a rookie if BB had him first. Would he be a different player? Better? Not as big of an ass hole?
Suh is out of control and yes that contract is stupid too...
Still mad that he took Dion down by his face mask and it went uncalled.
If its a fact it should be easy for you to point out instances when Seymour "disappeared"Says the child who flings names when they hear a fact that they don't like.
He was nowhere to be found in the 2011 Super Bowl when they needed him most. Pathetic display.If its a fact it should be easy for you to point out instances when Seymour "disappeared"
lolHe was nowhere to be found in the 2011 Super Bowl when they needed him most. Pathetic display.
It couldn’t be further from the truth.It's the truth. Nothing ignorant about it.
No, says the person who calls people that make idiotic statements an idiot.Says the child who flings names when they hear a fact that they don't like.
He is very likely the only human being ever to have that thought.If its a fact it should be easy for you to point out instances when Seymour "disappeared"
The dude probably looked at Seymour's sack totals and made assumptions.It's too easy and foolish to statstically infer where Seymour disappeared in a game.
The reality is that there were many games where his job was to accumulate blockers to open lanes for the LB'ers.
I doubt he put that much thought into it.The dude probably looked at Seymour's sack totals and made assumptions.
Seymour’s teams were 12-3 in the playoffs winning 3 SBs and getting to a 4th. The defenses allowed 18.3 ppg to the best teams in the league.It's too easy and foolish to statstically infer where Seymour disappeared in a game.
The reality is that there were many games where his job was to accumulate blockers to open lanes for the LB'ers.
Umm, check post #30...He is very likely the only human being ever to have that thought.
Huh?Umm, check post #30...
| 5 | 568 |
| 328 | 18K |
| 59 | 1K |
| 17 | 364 |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 1 - April 16 (Through 26yrs)











