IMO, changing the commercial breaks Q1,Q2,Q3,Q4 from 5,6,5,5 to 4,4,4,4 will make the games more watchable. That I like, even though the 4,4,4,4 will be slightly longer in duration.
Having a split screen commercial during live review is also a good idea.
Having centralized review for all replays is fine in principle. It should make calls more consistent across the league, which should help the players.
Having centralized review for all replays with Blandino and his team of suits making the calls in New York instead of actual referees is absurd. It will speed up the game but "fan trust" in the process will be lacking. I believe that few fans across the country actually trust Goodell and his Clowns.
To assume that guys who were surprised by the Ideal Gas Law have what it takes to make the right calls in sixteen remote locations consistently and accurately is highly questionable.
The centralized team should be seasoned referees, the best of the best. The decisions should be explained on the split screen. If it's a "by rule" decision, the rule # should be referenced on screen. As much transparency and precision as possible should be projected to the fan base. This can be done in real time centrally with a well equipped review team.
IMO, a downside of video review, is that on field officials no longer need to get it right. Even now, they can make a neutral call knowing that they get overruled by the replay decision. Going centralized may make that practice more prevalent.
