RecoveringCowboy
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- May 7, 2014
- Messages
- 4,584
- Reaction score
- 2,842
Let me give you an idea.
TO was a great receiver on the field.
TO killed multiple teams in the locker room. He basically single-handedly took away any shot these teams had to win a Super Bowl.
It sounds like most everyone here is evaluating TO almost exclusively on what he did on the field. Personally, I think how he was a team killer is a real important part of the evaluation. Anyone you add to the team who makes it next to impossible to win a title is not a HOF player in my thinking.
Different strokes for different folks. Just something to consider. I doubt many of you are going to change your criteria but at least you've heard the argument.
He has a point.
If QBs like Namath can be evaluated for inspiring on and off the field, why can't TO be evaluated for wrecking morale?
It works both ways.












