- Joined
- Jul 3, 2013
- Messages
- 43,587
- Reaction score
- 50,233
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.There hasn't been a shred of credible evidence that the Texans are even entertaining the idea of trading Watt. It's just baseless speculation by reporters like Cris Carter and Salisbury throwing **** against the wall and hoping it sticks.So much talk about the Texans trading Watt should give teams pause.
Is this the new 'Ryan Mallett will get us a first rounder' talk??
Actually, i can see Houston giving us a first rounder, but throwing in Watt is ludicrous
Is this the new 'Ryan Mallett will get us a first rounder' talk??
Is this the new 'Ryan Mallett will get us a first rounder' talk??
Actually, i can see Houston giving us a first rounder, but throwing in Watt is ludicrous
I'm starting to think neither Jimmy or Jacoby are gonna be heir to Brady, probably some QB we draft in the next few years
mentioning mallet in garoppolo talk is ignorant
The point was about overvaluing trade capital, not talent...I am sorry I wasn't clear enough for you, maybe you need to be spoon fed more, I will bear it in mind
It depends. If the Texans think Watt's best days are behind him and he will have trouble staying on the field, getting rid of his cap hit has value in and of itself.
Just like with the Cowboys and Romo, any pick the Cowboys get would be gravy, the real value in trading Romo is in the cap savings.
yes....and you used an incredibly stupid example......try using your brain next time.....if you can
Who are you?? It was a jokey comparison...maybe I should have gone LOL or LMAO or whatever internet people say these days to get down to the lowest common denominator
| 15 | 1K |
| 125 | 15K |
| 13 | 603 |
| 9 | 2K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 10 - April 25 (Through 26yrs)










