- Joined
- Mar 27, 2008
- Messages
- 30,875
- Reaction score
- 29,559
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.saying stupid **** makes people go there
I think everyone with a brain will realise it was a joke about overdoing trade capital. I didn't feel i would need to spoon feed that as I have respect for people on this board. Thanks for showing me the error of my ways.
No thanks. I don't want Watt's ego or contract.
Much respect, Patsinthesnow. I don't know if I can agree with your thought that Watt would be BB's best since Taylor. . I know Ty never won DPOY, but that's more because corners don't usually get that award. He allowed BB to do all the things we saw those defenses do (among other players, obviously). If Ty is on that 2007 roster, NE is 19-0. Revis, likewise, was no slouch. I think those guys are just as much, if not even slightly better and more impactful, than Watt. I'm not saying Watt isn't a generational talent. He's obviously a monster when at the top of his game. But those two corners were just flat-out shut you out types season in and season out, and they made their biggest plays in the biggest games . . . well, Ty definitely. I haven't always seen that from Watt. Has Watt ever really been a problem for the Patriots when they've played?Flowers - Branch - Brown - Watt would be the most dominating DL at the LOS in the league. That unit would allow us to play SS/coverage LBers behind them often. Both Flowers & Watt can play DT on passing downs.
Watt would be BB's best D player since LT so if the Texans would consider a similar trade it's definitely worth exploring.
In yet another point: if we had Watt for tomorrow, wouldn't you be a tad more confident?
The hypothesis is "If we HAD Watt". If you change the hypothesis, you are changing the question.No, because he is still injured and would just be one of the inactives, which is also where he would likely spend an inordination amount of his remaining career as a Pat.
The hypothesis is "If we HAD Watt". If you change the hypothesis, you are changing the question.
Watt and his suspect back go together.
| 15 | 1K |
| 125 | 15K |
| 13 | 603 |
| 9 | 2K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 10 - April 25 (Through 26yrs)











