mosi
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2004
- Messages
- 5,855
- Reaction score
- 4,947
Not sure if someone posted this already:
Oh god, why does this post fill me with dread! What is next, Bennett to the Jags for a 6th round pick?
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Not sure if someone posted this already:
I must admit that the only thing I was feeling unsettled about yesterday was the fact that the Bills, with all their injuries, managed to score 25 points on us.
Having Lombardi defend the Collins trade is akin to having Donna Brazille on CNN defending Hillary.
Re: the freelancing et al... Is it just me or is this an indictment on the lack of player leadership on D? Who is the leader on that side of the ball? Sometimes you need players policing themselves. Just don't see this happening on the old Seymour-Rodney days.
Lombardi not a fan of Collins or the rest of the defense, for that matter:
Re freelancing first line of leadership is MP.
But for some of them, what sense does it make to mail it in this year? Chris Long, for example, is here to win. He took less to be here. I don't feel that he's worried at the moment about next offseason.Great point. Part of the problem in my opinion is that practically anyone who's anyone on that defense has his contract up this season. Remember the lost locker room of 2009? People were asking why Wilfork as a veteran couldn't step up, be a leader, and get everyone in line. Well, from Wilfrok's perspective, he hadn't gotten paid, and he himself might not be here next year, so how can he take on a leadership role?
The same thing might be playing out here. There's Nink, McCourty, and Chung. That's it -- practically everyone else who's on defense will be a free agent next year, or is too wet behind the ears to take on a leadership role (Brown). Letting all these players' contracts expire at once may have been a poor strategy on Belichick's part if it's leading to a lack of leadership on defense.
Hmmm. This is the first I've heard the term "conditional" and it gives me some hope for more compensation. It COULD mean that the Pats might get a higher draft pick IF Collins eventually re-signs with the Browns. Maybe if he extends or resigns with the Browns we would get the Browns 2nd round pick.It has to be conditional since the Browns haven't been awarded the pick in question yet. What I've been hearing is that it's a compensatory 3rd that becomes a 4th if the Browns don't don't get a comp pick. Forget where I heard that, will dig it up and edit my post in a second.
Does the "forfeit the highest pick" provision apply to the 4th rounder we're losing this year? Because it would suck for the Browns to not get a comp 3rd, then the top pick in the 4th round becomes the one we forfeit. We'd end up with a pick near the end of the 4th for Collins.
What a shocking development for this f###### place...holy **** this is slowly turning into a political thread.
Hmmm. This is the first I've heard the term "conditional" and it gives me some hope for more compensation. It COULD mean that the Pats might get a higher draft pick IF Collins eventually re-signs with the Browns. Maybe if he extends or resigns with the Browns we would get the Browns 2nd round pick.
Now THAT would make a lot more sense. Collins is worth the 33rd pick in the draft to Cleveland if he signs a long term deal with them. In fact better than anything they could get with that pick, but still fair value for the Pats. If he is an 8 game rental, then a pick in the late 90's is decent value for both teams.
It's most likely either the 2017 3rd round compensatory pick (if the Browns get it) and if not the 2018 4th rounder.NFL is reporting it is a conditional.......4th Round Pick in......2018. They potentially would have gotten the same thing (or better) by letting him walk at the end of this season
But for some of them, what sense does it make to mail it in this year? Chris Long, for example, is here to win. He took less to be here. I don't feel that he's worried at the moment about next offseason.
Sheard is another guy who should be playing out of his mind right now so that he can get his big payday. Same goes to Butler except Butler's playing at a higher level than Sheard right now.
And as for Hightower, I can't see him as being a guy who will quit on the team. I'm sure he wants his pay, but I do think that, especially now, that BB really loves how he plays, and how he has already proven to be a great leader. He has to have a good feeling that he will be one of the guys that Bill will absolutely want paid.
So who does that now leave on the defense to hurt the leadership? I just don't buy that there's a lack of leadership on this defense. There's plenty. I am a huge, huge Collins fan, but it seems obvious to me that Collins was the one guy in his contract year who was a threat to having guys quit, ala Thomas back in 2009.
I think the Collins hate is mostly deserved but High and that secondary showed plenty of emotion. Front 4 was poor along with JC vs the Bills.
It's most likely either the 2017 3rd round compensatory pick (if the Browns get it) and if not the 2018 4th rounder.
Which is what happened in 2009. Thanks for clearing that up, that I do agree on.Sorry that I wasn't clear. I agree with your point that Collins was the one who was a threat to quitting. I was answering the question of - why isn't the leadership on the defense keeping Collins in line? My answer is that those other guys may not feel empowered to keep Collins in line if they themselves aren't sure about their long term future with the team. They may still do their jobs, but may feel uncomfortable telling someone else to do so for the good of the team.
| 13 | 440 |
| 13 | 897 |
| 8 | 3K |
| 7 | 2K |
| 17 | 3K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 7 - April 22 (Through 26yrs)











