- Joined
- Sep 2, 2006
- Messages
- 8,753
- Reaction score
- 8,104
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Technically true...but not in this case. Not to get political but I think Trayvon Martin could be an example of this where they made the right decision based on evidence but, justice is debatable.Disagree all you want but just because a court case doesn't turn out the way you want it to doesn't mean justice was denied.
Labor law requires a fair and impartial process. Article 46 doesn't overrule that.yup.....the players agreed to that possibility through the CBA
BTW, sorry Cleveland. Hope you enjoy your championship. Your Browns are about to lose by 80.
Labor law requires a fair and impartial process. Article 46 doesn't overrule that.
time to move on
might help the team coalesce, jimmy might play well and
maybe the bright side we take 4 weeks of wear and tear off our 39 yr old QB in potentially the last year that this team looks how its currently constituted
if they can go 2-2 we'll still have a shot at HFA.
The court battle is over.
If Brady did nothing wrong, I hope we're on to a defamation case.
What is the downside of Brady filing a defamation suit against Goodell and the league? I mean at this point, the whole country think he is a cheater, his legacy is forever tainted and his 4 Superbowls are viewed with huge asterisks.
speaking of the cleveland, tom should speak at the republican convention. huge platform to **** on roger. of course this wont happen.
So what reason did they give for denying?
The consequences are a lot more broad than article 146. The precedent this case sets makes things like notice, impartial arbitration and a fair process almost meaningless. The Law of Shop has become the Law of ****.Now it does.