Amendola's Neighbors Are Mad at Him

[SLGDEV]

My hyperbole is nothing of the sort, and is something that was actually dealt with in this country, and being against the law is irrelevant to the point of the post. You're just using the law comment for cover. As for the "rights end" argument,it's nonsensical in this context, because it's merely perspective based, which was my point. The "no blacks/etc..." contract features rights of blacks/etc.... versus the right of contract. Your political pre-dispositions will determine how you come down on the clash, not whether one is legal or not.

Thank you for making my point.

Making your point? Nonsense.

The "no blacks" ruling was legal at one point. I would have been against it then because I believe it violates the equal rights part of our society. However, there is nothing that could be done against it until the law was changed. Then it became illegal.

I have already granted you that Amendola did not violate a rule as his was a temporary structure. Legally, then, there is nothing that could be done.

 

[Deus Irae]

Making your point? Nonsense.

The "no blacks" ruling was legal at one point. I would have been against it then because I believe it violates the equal rights part of our society.

You used the law as a hiding point for your earlier position, but you state your disagreement with the "no blacks" without regard to the legality.

Again, thank you for making my point.

 

[SLGDEV]

Might have been a glitch. The same thing happened to me once, a couple of weeks back.

I posted most of my response to you piecemeal. Here is what is left that got banned due to flame 2619931a0a980323

The can modify the rule to clearly delineate what type of temporary structures, for how long, and under what circumstances.

And now it got through. ???????

 

[Galeb]

The irony is that you're doing the exact same thing you're accusing someone else of. You're just doing it from a different starting point.

To clarify, I'm pretty sure Dues still has me on ignore so he was probably unable to see the content of my posts.

 

[SLGDEV]

You used the law as a hiding point for your earlier position, but you state your disagreement with the "no blacks" without regard to the legality.

Again, thank you for making my point.

What are you talking about? You are truly confusing me. I stated in my response that I conceded that he had not violated a rule, just the spirit. I disagreed with the "no blacks" even when it was legal. That is my right as a human being, but I couldn't do anything about it. Should I have agreed with it simply because it was legal at the time? That seems to be what you are saying.

Now, what I am saying is that there is no equivalence between entering into a contractual arrangement for restricting the color of the house and with entering into a contractual agreement for "no blacks allowed". The reason for the non-equivalence is simply that one is legal and the other is not. It has absolutely NOTHING to do with personal preference. That is why your hyperbole is ridiculous.

 

[SLGDEV]

To clarify, I'm pretty sure Dues still has me on ignore so he was probably unable to see the content of my posts.

Is Deus a male? The avatar is of one really hot female.

 

[Deus Irae]

What are you talking about? You are truly confusing me. I stated in my response that I conceded that he had not violated a rule, just the spirit. I disagreed with the "no blacks" even when it was legal. That is my right as a human being, but I couldn't do anything about it. Should I have agreed with it simply because it was legal at the time? That seems to be what you are saying.

No, I was pointing out nonsensical nature of you "but it's the law' claim. People hold, and state, opinions on issues that are currently settled as law, all the time.

Now, what I am saying is that there is no equivalence between entering into a contractual arrangement for restricting the color of the house and with entering into a contractual agreement for "no blacks allowed". The reason for the non-equivalence is simply that one is legal and the other is not. It has absolutely NOTHING to do with personal preference. That is why your hyperbole is ridiculous.

Of course there's equivalence, and my post, by definition, wasn't hyperbole. And you're hiding behind the claim of legality again. Be better than that. Just admit the reality:

You don't care about defending property rights that conflict with your personal preferences. In fact, you'd rather they didn't exist. And that puts you in with a huge chunk of the American populace.

 

[Galeb]

Is Deus a male? The avatar is of one really hot female.

I'm pretty sure Dues is a male. He certainly has an eye for the ladies.

 

[XLIX]

The irony is that you're doing the exact same thing you're accusing someone else of. You're just doing it from a different starting point.

Not true. I'm not telling him how to live. If he wants to paint his house yellow polka dots, I don't give a turd whether he does or doesn't. If he wants to make deals with his neighbors whereby they all have to paint their houses yellow polka dots, that's none of my damn business and I'm not going to interfere and tell him he can't do that.

I don't force anyone to live in my neighborhood. Not a single soul is forced to live under the rules of my neighborhood organization (which are lawful in nature). Beyond that, outsiders should mind their own bleepin' business - just like I would never tell another neighborhood what they can and can't do amongst themselves.

 

[Deus Irae]

Not true. I'm not telling him how to live. If he wants to paint his house yellow polka dots, I don't give a turd whether he does or doesn't. If he wants to make deals with his neighbors whereby they all have to paint their houses yellow polka dots, that's none of my damn business and I'm not going to interfere and tell him he can't do that.

I don't force anyone to live in my neighborhood. Not a single soul is forced to live under the rules of my neighborhood organization (which are lawful in nature). Beyond that, outsiders should mind their own bleepin' business - just like I would never tell another neighborhood what they can and can't do amongst themselves.

You make exclusionary rules that are applied to people outside of the individual contract. Of course you are telling people how to live. It's moronic to even try pretending you're not doing precisely that. It's even more moronic to pull out the "outsiders should mind their own bleepin' business" crap, because minding your own business is precisely what you're not doing.

 

[SLGDEV]

You make exclusionary rules that are applied to people outside of the individual contract. Of course you are telling people how to live. It's moronic to even try pretending you're not doing precisely that. It's even more moronic to pull out the "outsiders should mind their own bleepin' business" crap, because minding your own business is precisely what you're not doing.

You post is nonsense. How is he forcing people outside to honor his contract? They don't have to buy there. (Please don't come in with more of that no blacks nonsense. We are talking about LEGAL agreements). If they CHOOSE to live there, it is then accepting those agreements VOLUNTARILY. I think the "only whilte paint" rule in the historic district of Martha's Vineyard is stupid. However, that is THEIR business. If I want a yellow house on Martha's Vineyard, then I have to buy outside the district. The choice would be MINE. The question would be "which is more important to me?".

 

[XLIX]

You make exclusionary rules that are applied to people outside of the individual contract. Of course you are telling people how to live. It's moronic to even try pretending you're not doing precisely that. It's even more moronic to pull out the "outsiders should mind their own bleepin' business" crap, because minding your own business is precisely what you're not doing.

Based on the above statement, it is painfully clear that you don't have the first clue what a neighborhood association is and you don't have the first clue what you are taking about (not for the first time, either).

I invite you to answer the same question the other individual ignored: If my neighbor and I create a contract whereby we each mutually and freely agree not to paint our houses yellow polka dots, and to only sell our property to individuals willing to adopt the same contract, and you live 1,000 miles away, then what business is it of yours to prevent my neighbor and me from creating such a contract?

I am 100% within my rights to draft a quid pro quo contract with my neighbors and anyone who wants to forbid me that right can go <expletive deleted> themselves.

 

[Galeb]

 

[IcyPatriot]

Tracked Down: Danny Amendola, Ali MacGraw and Ryan O’Neal, Rick Mahorn...

The oh-so-snooty College Hill neighbors, who complained about Patriots receiver Danny Amendola’s carport, now complaining that there are carloads of ladies cruising Danny’s Providence digs (and their neighborhood) — ladies who learned Amendola’s address as a result of the neighbors’ bellyaching

 

[Archeryaddict12]

Tracked Down: Danny Amendola, Ali MacGraw and Ryan O’Neal, Rick Mahorn...

Hahahaha. Once he gets a built diesel truck he will have diesel nuts Rollin coal and driving loud trucks in that neighborhood.

 

[JarOfMayo51]

There's a clip from one of the local media outlets with a reporter asking five or six well heeled and coiffed ladies of the neighborhood about this issue. I'll see if I can find it. Personally, I find their pretentiousness disgusting but...it does seem it IS their property and their duly enacted regulations call for the eradication of any temporary structure not in line with the specified regulations governing this segment of Benefit St.

Id love to see that video haha

EDIT: And he delivered

Thanks!

 

[Deus Irae]

You post is nonsense. How is he forcing people outside to honor his contract? They don't have to buy there. (Please don't come in with more of that no blacks nonsense. We are talking about LEGAL agreements). If they CHOOSE to live there, it is then accepting those agreements VOLUNTARILY. I think the "only whilte paint" rule in the historic district of Martha's Vineyard is stupid. However, that is THEIR business. If I want a yellow house on Martha's Vineyard, then I have to buy outside the district. The choice would be MINE. The question would be "which is more important to me?".

Based on the above statement, it is painfully clear that you don't have the first clue what a neighborhood association is and you don't have the first clue what you are taking about (not for the first time, either).

I invite you to answer the same question the other individual ignored: If my neighbor and I create a contract whereby we each mutually and freely agree not to paint our houses yellow polka dots, and to only sell our property to individuals willing to adopt the same contract, and you live 1,000 miles away, then what business is it of yours to prevent my neighbor and me from creating such a contract?

I am 100% within my rights to draft a quid pro quo contract with my neighbors and anyone who wants to forbid me that right can go <expletive deleted> themselves.

It's always humorous to see hypocrisy laid out this plainly, so thanks to both of you for the laughs. I'm sure your hypocrisy knows bounds, but you can't see them in your posts.

 

[XLIX]

It's always humorous to see hypocrisy laid out this plainly, so thanks to both of you for the laughs. I'm sure your hypocrisy knows bounds, but you can't see them in your posts.

There are few things more pathetic (yet also hilarious) than someone like you who cannot live without getting the last word, but simultaneously ignores a simple question and has absolutely nothing intelligent to say.

 

[RayClay]

So, they had driveways like that without carports in 1774?

 

[SLGDEV]

It's always humorous to see hypocrisy laid out this plainly, so thanks to both of you for the laughs. I'm sure your hypocrisy knows bounds, but you can't see them in your posts.

What an idiotic statement!!!!! Totally devoid of anything even remotely resembling logic.

Please, please, please take two courses somewhere. They are "Reading for Comprehension 101" and "Logic 101". I swear that reading Deus' posts on this subject makes me feel like I am Alice at the Mad Hatter's table for tea. I guess the old adage must be true - "The inmates think it is everyone else that is crazy".

Edit.
Wait. I just noticed something. Deus has two grey-out quotes as signature. I realize now she (I assume that Deus is female from the avatar) is just baiting us to get a rise. I won't be baited any further. This is it for me. I will not play her game.