PLEASE. Now you are sounding like ESPN creating a scandal where this is none. Everything you wrote about his college days were well known years ago and cost him a chance at being drafted. So rather than praise the kid for grabbing himself up by the bootstraps and making an NFL team as an UDFA, and then helping the Pats for the better part of 2 seasons and winning a ring, you'd pander to TMZ in yourself and scandal monger. tsk, tsk. Do you want to pillage him for being in the same car as his Steeler weed eater
Some Steeler fans want to make him out to be a bad apple i the Steeler locker room. Maybe Blount after seeing how a "real" organization was run in NE, he took one look at what Tomlim was doing in Pittsburgh and "noticed the difference". You can't hate him for that.
Bottom line; Every day the LaGarrette Blount has been in NE, he's behaved himself, worked hard, and produced on the field beyond expectations. If you don't like his "dreads" ....just say so.
But you couldn't be more right on Marshall. In 2-3 years that kid is going to be a starting CB in this league
OK, fair enough, you make a good point.
I like his dreads fine, he just doesn't fit into my "brilliant" (sarcasm intended) BB Non-KnuckleHead (NKH) theory, which is: that at BB's age (63), with his 6 rings, he has decided that from now on he wants to coach players that are actually, you know, fun to coach, and that is why he has drafted (most on this board would say "over-drafted") a long list of super professional, mature, "coach on the field" types recently, particularly in the secondary (e.g., Richards, Ryan, Harmon, Wilson, McCourtney). That is just talking about the secondary, but overall the players on this team seem to me to be uncommonly smart, professional, and mature. It has to be fun to coach for BB.
Blount and perhaps Branch have done a few knucklehead things in the past, so they don't fit my theory too well, although to be fair, as you pointed out, they have both been model citizens for the Patriots. I guess if the data does not fit the theory, then perhaps the theory needs to be changed, after all, changing the data to fit a pre-conceived theory is what happened in the Wells Report.