PATRIOTS NEWS Official Brady vs. NFL Federal Court 8/12 Thread (LIVE UPDATES)

[SVN]

So all this will be in an official transcript later or this guy is just leaking info ?

 

[sb1]

This is getting interesting. I'm a little surprised the judge is going to the facts more than the process...

 

[SHOWTIME15]

go get em' Berman

 

[Hoodie]

Alright berman, dont lead me off the ledge to betray later....

He'll ask tough questions of Kessler too. Don't get too excited.

 

[RelocatedPatFan]

This is getting interesting. I'm a little surprised the judge is going to the facts more than the process...

Then again, this isn't his first rodeo. I'll refrain from being optimistic until we've been grilled and come out looking better.

 

[DaBruinz]

Berman just blew up the NFL's argument and the Wells report all with one question..

 

[sb1]

Stephen Brown ?@PPVSRB 18s18 seconds ago Massapequa Park, NY

Nash: "Is there a text in which Mr. Brady instructs someone to put a needle in a football? No there is not such direct evidence."

 

[VectorPrime]

Then again, this isn't his first rodeo. I'll refrain from being optimistic until we've been grilled and come out looking better.

Hopefully his one question to Brady is whether he can get his autograph.

 

[smurfalarm]

This is getting interesting. I'm a little surprised the judge is going to the facts more than the process...

Strange, isn't it? We've been told again and again and again by lawyers that the judge will have no interest in the actual fact of whether or not Brady was involved in deflating balls, but the line of questioning by Berman contradicts that. I wonder if this means manifest disregard has potential to be a consideration in a ruling.

 

[sb1]

Nash: But other evidence "clearly indicates Mr. Brady’s knowledge and encouragement of this activity." Such as texts after game

 

[karguy85]

This is so damn misleading...

Stephen Brown ?@PPVSRB 12s12 seconds agoMassapequa Park, NY
Nash: But other evidence "clearly indicates Mr. Brady’s knowledge and encouragement of this activity." Such as texts after game

 

[SVN]

This is getting interesting. I'm a little surprised the judge is going to the facts more than the process...

I think this is a tactic by him to tell everyone he is looking at everything to encourage settlement. He may not rule based on all the stuff he is asking is hearing.

 

[tigerjohn]

Berman just blew up the NFL's argument and the Wells report all with one question..

I think it's critical to his desire for a settlement to understand Brady's view of his own innocence. If he feels the evidence is shaky or does not exist it will make Brady's position more reasonable.

 

[TBR]

PPVSRB
Nash: But other evidence "clearly indicates Mr. Brady’s knowledge and encouragement of this activity." Such as texts after game
2015-08-12, 12:01 PM


Uhhhh, no, not unless you twist the meaning of texts to fit the narrative

 

[RelocatedPatFan]

Strange, isn't it? We've been told again and again and again by lawyers that the judge will have no interest in the actual fact of whether or not Brady was involved in deflating balls, but the line of questioning by Berman contradicts that. I wonder if this means manifest disregard has potential to be a consideration in a ruling.

My hope is he'll attack Goodell as Arbitrator. i.e. Does Roger Goodell have the necessary skill set and neutrality to even assume such a position (given his handling of prior matters and especially this one).

 

[SVN]

This is so damn misleading...

Stephen Brown ?@PPVSRB 12s12 seconds agoMassapequa Park, NY
Nash: But other evidence "clearly indicates Mr. Brady’s knowledge and encouragement of this activity." Such as texts after game

wow, "encouragement of this activity"
I want to see of they discuss the ideal gas law and two gauge theory.

 

[DaBruinz]

Nash: But other evidence "clearly indicates Mr. Brady’s knowledge and encouragement of this activity." Such as texts after game

Nash just screwed himself.. He's going to have to point to which texts do this.. And we all know that none of them do..

 

[sb1]

Stephen Brown ?@PPVSRB 40s40 seconds ago Massapequa Park, NY

Nash: "The phone was destroyed. A factfinder, in this case Mr Goodell, it’s clearly reasonable to infer is further evidence of culpability"

 

[RhodyPatriot]

I'm VERY encouraged because I think Tom has the truth and facts on his side. If this judge is willing to "hear" this case I feel very good about it.

 

[BradyFTW!]

PPVSRB
Nash: But other evidence "clearly indicates Mr. Brady’s knowledge and encouragement of this activity." Such as texts after game
2015-08-12, 12:01 PM


Uhhhh, no, not unless you twist the meaning of texts to fit the narrative

Hahaha, after what game? After the AFCCG? Because that's just not true.