- Joined
- Jul 13, 2009
- Messages
- 12,038
- Reaction score
- 11,230
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I agree there. I don't think anyone at the table particularly cares about them though, unfortunately.
Different circumstance. That case was for an NFL employee with no collective bargaining agreement. The CBA would supersede that case since the CBA does say Goodell can be an arbitrator.
He represents his client. You may have hated him because of his client's position in the lockout. But you love him because of his client's position now.
How can he be an arbitrator if he is the only one that can impose player punishments?
Daniel Wallach@WALLACHLEGALActually, if Berman overturns the suspension based on Peterson and Peterson is then overturned on appeal, wouldn't that pull the rug out from under Brady's victory?
Because the CBA allows it.
If he wins this, I will buy a Jeffrey Kessler fat-head for my memorabilia collection and hang it in the man-cave.I have to say I hated Jeffrey Kessler during the lockout, but I absolutely love him on our side now. He may be a bit of a weasel, but he seems to be 10x the lawyer than anyone on the NFL side.
Only reason I give NFL a 40% chance is because of deferential standard of review for arbitration decisions. Otherwise, easy win for T. Brady
My understanding is that the court is not just considering a proceeding, they are proceeding with a proceeding to consider Goodell in contempt of court. IIRC there is a hearing scheduled for 8/13 on the contempt issue.It shouldn't because the lower courts decision is still valid until it is overturned. In fact I read the NFL is currently not complying with that decision and court is considering a contempt of court proceeding.
Just seems like they have two rules that contradict each other then.
Because the CBA allows it.
And the bigger context is that the NFLPA gave this away in the last negotiations, and is now desperately trying to chip away at it, because they were blinded by their greed and didn't see this abuse of power coming.
The NFLPA gave it away in the 1960s. The NFLPA has not been able to get it back since. It is a big difference. It isn't like this was a new concession that they gave up in 2010. They tried to get an independent arbitrator and Go
Goodell said the issue was non-negotiable.
Thanks for the correction...hopefully all of this will provide a better foundation for the next round of negotiations. And hopefully the NFLPA won't be influenced to accept what Goodell (or whomever is in the job) says is non negotiable.
| 9 | 2K |
| 8 | 2K |
| 22 | 5K |
| 196 | 38K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 3 - April 18 (Through 26yrs)











