PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Patriots Legal Counsel Rebuttal of Wells Report

Status
Not open for further replies.


 
Last edited:
Wtf is your problem? personally insulting me because I think 1 sentence in the entire rebuttal comes across as a weak argument, while in full support of everything else..

we're all dealing with enough BS with all this negative media attention, now we have to worry about friendly fire too? Go f*** yourself
No personal insult intended whatsoever, aimed at the mindless talking heads who are promoting this line of reasoning, which is incredibly weak.
 
You are making my point.
The only way to find guilt is to say everyone is lying. The only way to CREDIBLY say everyone is lying is to have EVIDENCE TO CONTRADICT. There is no evidence to contradict. The only 'evidence' is Wells interpretation of texts, which the texter and recipient explained and he called a lie.
Under that standard everyone is guilty of everytihng.
Did you do it?
No.
You are lying, you clearly did it. Based upon my disbelief of your answer you are clearly guilty.
I believe that was the line of reasoning used by Stalin.
 
No personal insult intended whatsoever, aimed at the mindless talking heads who are promoting this line of reasoning, which is incredibly weak.

Well then I apologize for overreacting.. I think it's obvious some of us are quite defensive lately with all this stuff haha
 
So is Mcnally the overweight one or JJ ? And who asked who deflate and give the jacket?

McNally is overweight. That's not obvious to you?
McNally told Jastremski to deflate and give the jacket.
 
McNally is overweight. That's not obvious to you?
McNally told Jastremski to deflate and give the jacket.
Thats what I assumed but is Mcnally asking JJ to 'deflate and' give the jacket ? It should fit McNally without the deflate
 
Thats what I assumed but is Mcnally asking JJ to 'deflate and' give the jacket ? It should fit McNally without the deflate

Im totally confused by what you are saying here. He means give the jacket to a player.
 
Im totally confused by what you are saying here. He means give the jacket to a player.
Ok Sorry got it. without the picture , just reading the text I assumed Mcnally wanted the jacket.
 
Based on rigorous scientific studies I've been conducting last night and this morning, I find that it is more probable than not that McNalley didn't wash his hands.

For that, we dock the New England Patriots an additional first round pick, in the 2016 NFL draft.
 
Oh I think it can certainly refer to weight loss and thay syncing of the text is amazing, but ultimately it's a weak defense in this case given how out of control this has all gotten.

If it's true, it's true. Not all truths are monumental.

As for the idea that it's a weak defense, that depends on what they have to support the assertion. If it's demonstrably the truth, it's as strong a defense as you can get.
 
ok, look. we all love our team and we will defend them till death. but let's take off the homer glasses here.

the whole 'deflater' is about weight-loss is just plain stupid. it's idiotic. no matter how you slice it, it should not have included in the report. i don't care if that was the truth. i don't care if mcnally's middle name is deflatorian living in deflateville. you can't just put that in this 'serious' rebuttal report because only outcome is a mockery by entire media and haters all over the country. cnn, fox, every media is mocking at us and we have nobody to blame but us because we didn't have to put that out there.

this really hurts. i thought we are smarter than that.

and they still haven't fixed the typo. 'professer'
http://wellsreportcontext.com/mackinnons-scientific-conclusion/

this whole thing looks so amateur. i'm very disappointed. this was a great idea, but a bad execution.


we had a chance to hit a home run.
IMO, we blew it.
 
ok, look. we all love our team and we will defend them till death. but let's take off the homer glasses here.

the whole 'deflater' is about weight-loss is just plain stupid. it's idiotic. no matter how you slice it, it should not have included in the report. i don't care if that was the truth. i don't care if mcnally's middle name is deflatorian living in deflateville. you can't just put that in this 'serious' rebuttal report because only outcome is a mockery by entire media and haters all over the country. cnn, fox, every media is mocking at us and we have nobody to blame but us because we didn't have to put that out there.

this really hurts. i thought we are smarter than that.

and they still haven't fixed the typo. 'professer'
http://wellsreportcontext.com/mackinnons-scientific-conclusion/

this whole thing looks so amateur. i'm very disappointed. this was a great idea, but a bad execution.


we had a chance to hit a home run.
IMO, we blew it.

We had to put something out there.

If the weight loss explanation is not true, and they know it's not true, it stands to reason (given the caliber of the people involved in this case) that they could have rationalized a better explanation. They didn't.

Why do you think that is?
 
no we didn't have to. we didn't have to explain everything. it really was a bad move because just look around. they don't talk about anything but the weight loss.

if i'm kraft, i'm furious.
 
ok, look. we all love our team and we will defend them till death. but let's take off the homer glasses here.

the whole 'deflater' is about weight-loss is just plain stupid. it's idiotic. no matter how you slice it, it should not have included in the report. i don't care if that was the truth. i don't care if mcnally's middle name is deflatorian living in deflateville. you can't just put that in this 'serious' rebuttal report because only outcome is a mockery by entire media and haters all over the country. cnn, fox, every media is mocking at us and we have nobody to blame but us because we didn't have to put that out there.

this really hurts. i thought we are smarter than that.

and they still haven't fixed the typo. 'professer'
http://wellsreportcontext.com/mackinnons-scientific-conclusion/

this whole thing looks so amateur. i'm very disappointed. this was a great idea, but a bad execution.


we had a chance to hit a home run.
IMO, we blew it.


I can't believe nobody in the room read that part and exercised common sense. Bummer for me.

But that Brady appeal letter was awesome.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

PatsFans.com LinkHub

𝕏 / Tweet
twitter.com
Uncategorized
twitter.com · by Ian
4h
𝕏 / Tweet
Post from @MLFootball on X: Funny Video of Daniel Faalele
NFL Videos
x.com · by Ian
9h
𝕏 / Tweet
Post from @Brewers on X: 22 Runs During a Wild Night
Video
x.com · by Ian
13h
𝕏 / Tweet
X.com: Watching Tom Brady Tear Through the Playoffs at Age 41
Patriots Videos
twitter.com · by Uptown
3d
𝕏 / Tweet
Post from @ghetto_gronk on X: How it's going for Tua
Funny Videos
x.com · by Ian
4d
𝕏 / Tweet
X.com: Patriots Offensive Line in Front of Behren Morton 8/13
Patriots News
twitter.com · by manxman2601
5d
𝕏 / Tweet
X.com: Efton Chism III Career Stats
Patriots Stats
twitter.com · by manxman2601
5d
Patriots vs Eagles Joint Practice: 5 Things We Learned
TRANSCRIPT: Mike Vrabel Press Conference 8/19
Tuesday Patriots Notebook 8/18: Team Taking it Slow With Lomu
MORSE: Practice 17 Notes and Updated Patriots 53-Man Roster Projection
TRANSCRIPT: Mike Vrabel Press Conference 8/17
Monday Patriots Notebook 8/17: Gonzalez Has a Big Decision to Make
Patriots News 08-16, Post PS Game #1 53-Man Roster Projection
MORSE: Notes & Analysis of Patriots Training Camp – Day 15
TRANSCRIPT: Mike Vrabel Press Conference 8/15
MORSE: Good, Bad, and Ugly From Patriots’ Underwhelming Performance vs Colts
Back
Top