As Gisele reminded us, Brady cannot both throw the ball and catch it. He also cannot block the D-lineman and drop back, etc. etc. etc.
There's a frustration here about WR quality, OL quality, and the possibility of (gasp) a Brady quality issue. One Gisele is plenty, right?
This is the problem with a team game. I think with more time in the pocket the Dobsons and Thompkins of the world look a little better. But it's not like they've scared people before. We have no history of either of them being scary good. Ditto Amendola. He's been "pretty good at getting open" in his prime, but never "OMG we're playing against Amendola, it's a nightmare for the DC!"
HOWEVER, given that information -- given the information of where this team already was going, w/much more defensive splash both in the draft and Free Agency -- I did not expect enormous #s. I did not think we had the receivers for it.
The O-line depletion at the last moment was the most worrying factor.
In Miami we could not overcome these various decrements (or if you prefer, Brady could not overcome them.) Since then, we have - against the Peterson-less Vikings and the Raiders.
That said: I cannot wait to see this D against some of the better teams on the sked, including Denver. I expect the offense to be better than it is now, but no more than middle of the pack. Of course it's possible that the names we now deride will hit some yet-unknown breakthrough and get much better... or that a healed thigh bruise will fix throwing mechanics and blah blah blah blah blah... I just see this as a 20-aerial TD team, and that's only because production increases.
This is not 2007. It's a somewhat exciting concept to me in some ways. This can be a ****-hot D; to some extent, necessity might be the mother of such defenses. If that's the case, we're starting to look like we have necessity in spades
Ok work time