the OL need was addressed later in the draft.......how that pans out is up in the air, as are most draft decisions, but they had their board, i have to assume some level of trust until proven otherwise......but generally speaking, interior OL dropoff from round 2 to 4 or 5 isn't that great
RB? WR? those would be luxury picks, not need based by any means......replacing one #5 receiver with upside with another #5, new to the system, with potential upside really isn't a round 2 move imho
DT was addressed the previous round.....there's a lot of question marks on the roster on the d-line, but i am going to assume knowledge of rehab, etc came into play here.....the fill to that 'need' might already be there
we may be faulting the pick of the player down the road, but i just don't find flaw with the logic of addressing backup QB that early........i didn't necessarily see it coming ahead of time, but looking at it now, i understand the decision, and it makes sense....