- Joined
- Oct 20, 2007
- Messages
- 29,801
- Reaction score
- 20,475
I was definitely wrong about Edelman. I thought he was a nice player but not a major cog, and wouldn't have really cared if he'd left this past offseason, since I figured that Amendola would do all of the things that Edelman ended up doing. I still don't think he's someone that you want as your top WR, but I'm definitely coming around to the idea that he can be a good WR2 on an exceptional offense.
This is partly because, after seeing more of his versatility at WR this year, I'm thinking of him less as a poor man's Welker and more as a poor man's Antonio Brown. While they both lack the height and speed to be a prototypical WR1, they make up for a lot of it by exploding in and out of their cuts, running very precise routes, having great hands, and running almost every route in the route tree. Brown is clearly the more productive player, but Edelman does seem to be that kind of guy. Comparing him to Welker undersells his versatility, while highlighting the fact that he'll never do what Welker does anywhere near as well as Welker does it.
This is partly because, after seeing more of his versatility at WR this year, I'm thinking of him less as a poor man's Welker and more as a poor man's Antonio Brown. While they both lack the height and speed to be a prototypical WR1, they make up for a lot of it by exploding in and out of their cuts, running very precise routes, having great hands, and running almost every route in the route tree. Brown is clearly the more productive player, but Edelman does seem to be that kind of guy. Comparing him to Welker undersells his versatility, while highlighting the fact that he'll never do what Welker does anywhere near as well as Welker does it.











