PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Why did this team sign Tebow?

Next Opp: TBD
THE HUB FOR PATRIOTS FANS SINCE 2000

CURRENT POPULAR DISCUSSIONS:
Harold Landry Update
Posted By: DaBruinz
April 17, 2026 at 9:14 am
Total Replies: 60

# Of Users:18
Headcase40yrpatsfanZumaDaBruinzpatfankenRobertWeathersOne-If-By-SeaHuckleberry1PapeRoss12jimnance
Patriots Announce 2026 HOF Finalists
Posted By: Clonamery
April 17, 2026 at 9:13 am
Total Replies: 55

# Of Users:25
bresnaTriumphcaptain stoneJoeSixPatstinkypeteZumactpatsfan77Clonamerypatfankenh0c2000turkeyneck
TODAY'S MOST REACTED POSTS:
manxman26012026 Draft: WR
4 Reactions
04/16 at 8:22 pm

By: manxman2601

Clonamery2026 Pre-Draft Meetings
4 Reactions
04/17 at 4:56 am

By: Clonamery

KenRuinard/USATodayNetworkSouthCarolina/USATODAYNETWORKviaImagnImages
');">
TODAY'S TOP POSTERS:#
manxman260117 posts
DaBruinz17 posts
Clonamery9 posts
mayoclinic8 posts
DoubleDeluxe6 posts
 

Should the Patriots cut Tebow?

  • Cut Tebow

    Votes: 155 64.6%
  • Keep Tebow

    Votes: 85 35.4%

  • Total voters
    240
Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Should Tebow be cut?

My point exactly. We need a lot more help at TE then we do QB. My point was mainly that we need to use Tebow's athleticism and not his throwing arm. Whether or not that's FB, TE, etc...

Well we don't know whether Tebow can catch the ball which is why I discount him as a TE. What we do know is that he is that in terms of size/agility, Tebow is arguably one of the best on our offense and that he's elite as a short yardage runner so why not play to his strengths and use him as a potentially elite short yardage back or FB?
 
Re: Should Tebow be cut?

He can't play quarterback. Is there any evidence that he's a better tight end or full back than anyone currently on the roster? I don't care when he's cut, but he represents a huge waste of a roster spot.
 
Re: Should Tebow be cut?

"Tebow Lover". That's funny and so original.

Find a new hero. TT isnt a good one.. and no, no matter how much you want it to be true Timmy wont be an NFL TE any time soon. He is an NFL bench warmer and if he wasn't such a sideshow he would probably be out of the NFL.
 
He clearly hasn't learned how to play the position right -- not the mental aspect, nor the mechanics. But he's getting there on the mechanics. But for every step forward on his mechanics, there's two steps back on the mental aspect. He's clearly listening to voices in his head. And you have to play this position with rhythm and confidence.

Yeah, that's the Josh factor, I'm thinking. That mental stutter step keeping him from seeing the field is having to stop and look over at the thought balloon with Josh's face in it saying "Ball by your ear, up high." Alternately, when he goes more by "instinct", the balls out to the side 18 inches and at about shoulder level when he side-arms it into whatever crowd he feels like.

I think these are signs of lil Timmy trying to go back to the playground and relearn every throwing motion he's taken for like 15 years and un-learn them. I'm not confident at all that the Pats can magically re-wire all that. My guess is that they can't fix it by the time they name the 53.

Anyway, the purposes he serves are

(1) a backup quarterback, which you have to have. Mallet will not be after another year probably. Tebow gives them the ability to fulfill that requirement at league minimum salary, and free up dollars for other players. And have the luxury to trade Mallet.

Again, that's if they keep 3... he's got to earn enough of a spot that they feel it's worth the spot to keep a Mallet alternative for life-after-Mallet. I think it's unlikely that he replaces Mallet as the #2 this season.

(2) A project. He's big and physically talented. He's gotten by on physical ability and instincts, and had a lot of success doing it. He could be a good player if he can be taught the game the right way. So he could have an upside -- perhaps a multiyear, long term backup to Brady, on the theory that Brady plays 6 more years and no one else wants to sit behind him that long. And that leads into the final value.

I think that's the theory Josh is pitching: He's a 1-in-10 shot to be re-wireable so that the team can actually use the natural athleticism he does have... as in, low likelihood of success, but if you can fix him, high upside.

(3) Utility player -- punt protector, 2 point conversion specialist, and general athlete that can do some things for you. This includes scout team quarterback, etc. To the extent you have to carry a backup anyway, it would be nice to get something else out of the position. Because I don't think there is a backup anywhere that can truly come in for Tom Brady without the season being ruined. Cassell 2 is probably not going to happen.

He's got to bring that to buy him time... and he'd better recognize that you make the team by any means necessary, w/the Pats. You don't just walk in, say you can sell jerseys to a whole new market, and insist you're a QB or nothing.

So, those are 3 decent reasons. Tebow just has to be above some minimum level of decency as a player to make it work -- and it remains to be seen if he can get there in this type of offense or at all.

Totally agree: We see in you a low probability chance but with a high upside if everything clicks... what are you going to do to make yourself uncuttable?

I hate Tebow fans, and honestly, in my heart, I'm at least annoyed by Tebow himself. However, he won't be annoying if he just shuts up and plays football.

That being the case, if he can convince the Pats, I'll buy it. But I think he has a far from straightforward path to actually playing for the Pats. He has to pitch in any way he possibly can to have a shot.

It's an interesting storyline to follow, and for the time being we have to put up with a whole new breed of annoying fans. But time will tell. If he does turn out to be any good, we'll have to make room for them.

I'd like nothing more than to do so, because that would mean that high upside actually has a scintilla of hope to it. I just don't think he's going to put down that marker.
 
Re: Should Tebow be cut?

He can't play quarterback. Is there any evidence that he's a better tight end or full back than anyone currently on the roster? I don't care when he's cut, but he represents a huge waste of a roster spot.

Bingo!!!!!
 
Re: Should Tebow be cut?

I more or less agree, but while he's playing QB he's not helping the young receivers develop. The Pats should've signed a rookie as third QB in camp -- someone who can actually throw.

This to me is the biggest issue. We wasted 2 1/2 valuable preseason quarters trying to let Tebow do his thing while our young receivers got no chance to work on their game. If you want to play Tebow for the 4th quarter, that's one thing. But putting him in for that long while Mallett sits on the sideline was an abominable decision. It did nothing to help develop our offense. I have no idea what this coaching staff is thinking. I really feel that this whole experiment is just one big ego trip by BB and McDaniels.
 
Re: Should Tebow be cut?

OK here's why we should keep Tebow.
If Brady goes down and Mallet comes in he is inaccurate but close enough that at least one receiver will reach out for a badly thrown ball and get led into a Safety or something.
Tebow's incomplete passes are not close enough for anyone to try and catch them.

Also Tebow could improve the team's draft position. (C'mon, we are not going deep into the play offs with Mallet.)
 
Re: Should Tebow be cut?

Find a new hero. TT isnt a good one.. and no, no matter how much you want it to be true Timmy wont be an NFL TE any time soon. He is an NFL bench warmer and if he wasn't such a sideshow he would probably be out of the NFL.

Find any post where I've said that Tebow is a "hero" or that I think he's anything more than a role player or backup on this offense. Please take as long as you like because you won't find it. And then while you're doing that, you might want to grow up a little too. Just a thought.
 
Re: Should Tebow be cut?

He can't play quarterback. Is there any evidence that he's a better tight end or full back than anyone currently on the roster? I don't care when he's cut, but he represents a huge waste of a roster spot.

No, but there is evidence that he is athletic enough to change games and make plays.
 
Re: Should Tebow be cut?

This to me is the biggest issue. We wasted 2 1/2 valuable preseason quarters trying to let Tebow do his thing while our young receivers got no chance to work on their game. If you want to play Tebow for the 4th quarter, that's one thing. But putting him in for that long while Mallett sits on the sideline was an abominable decision. It did nothing to help develop our offense. I have no idea what this coaching staff is thinking. I really feel that this whole experiment is just one big ego trip by BB and McDaniels.

Mallett was injured lest you forget. They were clearly playing it safe.
 
Re: Should Tebow be cut?

IMHO, the receivers would have been helped if they had Kafka in there running the normal patriot offense instead of the special Tebow offense that won't be run unless there are two quarterback injuries.

This to me is the biggest issue. We wasted 2 1/2 valuable preseason quarters trying to let Tebow do his thing while our young receivers got no chance to work on their game. If you want to play Tebow for the 4th quarter, that's one thing. But putting him in for that long while Mallett sits on the sideline was an abominable decision. It did nothing to help develop our offense. I have no idea what this coaching staff is thinking. I really feel that this whole experiment is just one big ego trip by BB and McDaniels.
 
Re: Should Tebow be cut?

Find any post where I've said that Tebow is a "hero" or that I think he's anything more than a role player or backup on this offense. Please take as long as you like because you won't find it. And then while you're doing that, you might want to grow up a little too. Just a thought.

No, you seem to think TT is some sort of potential TE on a team that according to you has a rag tag group of guys (some of which) did not put up the kinda stats necessary to meet your expectations. Everyone else seems to think we have some great options and depth at the TE position.

That is all great that you have your own opinion, but you are not correct about several things and just dont want to admit it.
 
Re: Should Tebow be cut?

IMHO, the receivers would have been helped if they had Kafka in there running the normal patriot offense instead of the special Tebow offense that won't be run unless there are two quarterback injuries.

I don't really see this as the case. Most of the things developmental receivers need to do can be done regardless of who is at QB: running routes, beating press, making reads. The only thing arguably missing was catching the ball which is probably the one thing they shouild be good at anyway.
 
Re: Should Tebow be cut?

Whilst I envision Tebow as a FB and not a TE, your post makes no sense. Our logjam at TE features two that combined for a whopping nine receptions last year, an undrafted rookie and another coming of a serious injury. As to your first point, how is that relevant? What are the skills necessary to play QB that a TE needs as well?

Well we don't know whether Tebow can catch the ball which is why I discount him as a TE. What we do know is that he is that in terms of size/agility, Tebow is arguably one of the best on our offense and that he's elite as a short yardage runner so why not play to his strengths and use him as a potentially elite short yardage back or FB?

No, you seem to think TT is some sort of potential TE on a team that according to you has a rag tag group of guys (some of which) did not put up the kinda stats necessary to meet your expectations. Everyone else seems to think we have some great options and depth at the TE position.

That is all great that you have your own opinion, but you are not correct about several things and just dont want to admit it.


Reading helps.

As for the TEs I like Gronk obviously and think Sudfeld has tremendous potential. He's also had six injuries in his college career. As for the others, I think they're borderline JAGS which is pretty much what Hooman and Fells were when we signed them. Ballard I'm a little bit higher on but even then he's a still injured slow blocking TE who wasn't used in the pass game last night.
 
Re: Should Tebow be cut?

I don't really see this as the case. Most of the things developmental receivers need to do can be done regardless of who is at QB: running routes, beating press, making reads. The only thing arguably missing was catching the ball which is probably the one thing they shouild be good at anyway.

You mean those WRs who were in their first NFL game? Come on...They need Reps in the system they are going to have to master in 30 days, not the Tim Tebow "I can't throw the ball, so we need to change everything" play book.
 
Re: Should Tebow be cut?

Trying to have reads to be in synch with Tebow is truly a waste of development time.

I don't really see this as the case. Most of the things developmental receivers need to do can be done regardless of who is at QB: running routes, beating press, making reads. The only thing arguably missing was catching the ball which is probably the one thing they shouild be good at anyway.
 
Re: Should Tebow be cut?

Reading helps.

As for the TEs I like Gronk obviously and think Sudfeld has tremendous potential. He's also had six injuries in his college career. As for the others, I think they're borderline JAGS which is pretty much what Hooman and Fells were when we signed them. Ballard I'm a little bit higher on but even then he's a still injured slow blocking TE who wasn't used in the pass game last night.

I did read...and you seemed pretty clear - TE/QB

You had even specifically asked about QB/TE so I assumed that is where you were going with it. Why wouldn't I?

Fells has been having a great camp and looked great last night. He was hurt last year. Hoo is tremendously versatile and is not breaking the bank. They are going to want to try to keep Ballard and not expose Suds to the wire. Gronk is number one. They are going to have to make a tough cut if not 2 and possibly IR Ballard. Its a tough decision.
 
oK After reading some of these posts, I'm willing to concede my thinking really needs adjustment, especially with the amount of RBs it would be nice to have on the roster right now...

I do still see Tebow as:
-High Character
-Hard Working
-Not good at any particularly one thing
-Pretty versatile athletically
-Presumably pretty smart (though I'm not really sure on this point, honestly)

That still sounds like a Patriots guy to me. But because he's technically a QB, just being versatile, hard working, and high character might not be enough as it would if he was some sort of project TE/WR or something.

I guess now I have to think about whether we're applying different rules because he's a QB, or because he is Tebow, and if either makes sense for lapse in consistency. Or maybe there's no different rules at all and I want him to work because I think with time he'll legitimately get a lot better.
 
Re: Should Tebow be cut?

Trying to have reads to be in synch with Tebow is truly a waste of development time.

Exactly! He is such a stiff at QB I think its detrimental to the development of the rookie WRs. The Vets not as much. But you need someone out there.

We all know he only went in because of Mallet getting hurt. If Mallet did not get hurt I think Mallet would have stayed in most of the game. He should be pretty locked in with the TB system and the synergy with the receivers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft 6 – A Week Before the Draft
TRANSCRIPT: Eliot Wolf Pre-Draft Press Conference 4/13
Patriots News 04-12, What To Watch For In The NFL Draft
MORSE: Pre-Draft Patriots News and Notes
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft 5
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft 5
Mark Morse
1 week ago
Patriots Part Ways with Another Linebacker as Offseason Roster Shake-Up Continues
Patriots News 04-05, Mock Draft 2.0, Patriots Look For OL Depth
MORSE: 18 Game Schedule and Other Patriots Notes
TRANSCRIPT: Mike Vrabel Press Conference at the League Meetings 3/31
MORSE: Smokescreens and Misinformation Leading Up to Patriots Draft
Back
Top