Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.The comparison to the 2006 receivers is a poor one, and that's unusual for Mike.
That 2006 set was beyond teh suck, save for Jabar Gaffney.
although he should at least be better off at TE
This might be the understatement of the year. To say that the Pats TE's this year compared to 2006 "should be better" is like saying the Denver Broncos QB situation last year "should be better" with Peyton Manning instead of Tim Tebow.
Also, he's at least deeper at RB than he was in 2006. Dillon wasn't the same that year, and Maroney was... well, Maroney.
Gronk's already injured and Hernandez is an injury waiting to happen. Given that the Patriots TE situation was better in 2006 (Watson/Graham) than Ballard/OhOh/Fells, IMO, I felt my posting "should be better" was appropriate.
Preventive maintenance on gronks back, Hernandez had a scope and they are already done? What's next amendola broke his finger and he's done for 5 years. All these decisions were ones that will benefit the team and they will be good by the season. WOW deus.
Since I am basically not a nice person, I cannot wait to go to summer training camp and watch TFB melt down and unleash a barrage of F bombs at a couple hapless WR candidates. Trust me, it'll be epic!
I never claimed either was done, but I'm not sure what you're "wow" about. Gronk missed 5 regular season games last year, and Hernandez missed 6. Gronk has had multiple surgeries on the same arm and will be dealing with back surgery as well. Only a fool would claim that they can be positive he'll be on the field for the Patriots this year.
As for Hernandez, he's never played a full season for the Patriots.
I expect both to be ready, given the reports that are out there, but I'm not fool enough to claim certainty.
This might be the understatement of the year. To say that the Pats TE's this year compared to 2006 "should be better" is like saying the Denver Broncos QB situation last year "should be better" with Peyton Manning instead of Tim Tebow.
Also, he's at least deeper at RB than he was in 2006. Dillon wasn't the same that year, and Maroney was... well, Maroney.
Preventive maintenance on gronks back, Hernandez had a scope and they are already done? What's next amendola broke his finger and he's done for 5 years. All these decisions were ones that will benefit the team and they will be good by the season. WOW deus.
Gronk missing the entire year? I give maybe a 2-3% chance of that at most. Missing the first six games is a far greater possibility, but I wouldn't bet on that either at this point.
As for Hernandez, his injury last year was not one of the "injury prone" variety. There isn't a player who wouldn't have been significantly injured if they had a player land on his ankle the way Edelman landed on Hernandez's.
And the other two years, he missed two games each season. He seems to be really tough and a fast healer. So even if the odds are good that he will miss a game or two this season, it doesn't appear to be a high probability that he will miss significant time.
"should be better"..... this is all over "should be better"
It's been specifically mentioned that Brady has not been his usual nasty self with WR ****ups, probably because he knows there's nobody else if he ignores them.
| 13 | 504 |
| 74 | 4K |
| 19 | 499 |
| 3 | 458 |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 10 - April 25 (Through 26yrs)











