- Joined
- Oct 10, 2006
- Messages
- 76,878
- Reaction score
- 66,861
So the change of scheme/philosophy, though short lived, DOES make a big difference. Where are the doubters now who proclaimed our defense, especially our secondary, was terrible due to talent ALONE and not scheme. You know who you are.
The team blitzed the Colts because the Colts have:
- A QB who gambles on his throws
- A poor offensive line
- A poor running game
The coaching staff, which you spend your time bashing, is good enough to understand that and plan accordingly. The coaching staff is also good enough to understand that they can't do that with every team, because they don't have the defensive secondary they'd need to pull it off. They alson blitzed the Rams because the Rams line stinks and Bradford withers under pressure.
When you've got personnel problems, you have to scheme to cover them up or minimize them. Since BB believes that the worst thing you can do is give up a TD in one big play, his approach is going to be that of defending against the big play before anything else, and it's worked to the tune of 5 Super Bowl appearances in 10 years. I don't know why you can't seem to figure that out.
Last edited:












