- Joined
- Feb 8, 2005
- Messages
- 48,071
- Reaction score
- 29,559
I hear you, but the problem is, as someone else pointed out, the new kickoff rules kind of change that. Unfortunately for Slater while he's a "WR" on the roster, they're too thin depth and talent wise to warrant a roster spot on a guy who can't do more than one thing. Again, I don't want to take away from what he's done, but they need another guy (or potentially two) and it's a numbers game. If they bring in two-mid tier guys behind Welker and ahead of Branch, from there you have Edelman on the depth chart at 5. Something would have to give. If someone gets hurt, Slater can't give them anything. Again, I'd love to be wrong, but so far it hasn't worked out that way for him. You can't even make the argument about calling Edelman a DB because in all likelihood they're going to bring in more depth there as well. He was a stopgap fix, I don't think BB wants to start him there again next season.
I think part of the hang up you are having, Ian, is that you are assuming the Pats bring back Branch. I don't see that happening. I think they pick up 1 veteran type and add 1-2 more via the draft. Then you'd have Welker, Vet, Edelman, Draft pick, Draftpick. Slater would be a STer. Which is what they started with this year.
I think that people are really ignoring how good Slater was on Kick coverages. In fact, Slater and White were two of the reasons the Pats kick coverage unit was so good this year. The Pats were 6th in kick return average allowed at 21.6 YPR. I can't remember the last time they ranked so well in the kick coverage. I know people will complain about Gostkowski and such, but it turns out that BB didn't want him kicking TBs all the time. The reason being that the coverage was so good.
Slater is still a guy who lines up on all 6 special teams units. He's among the best in the league at it. Those guys don't come along often. You need to keep them while you can..











