Re: Sydney rice and ray edwards
I don't feel like looking it up, but I know that the way that the NFL chose to word the rules regarding the # of years needed to reach UFA status is very f***ed up. I honestly can't remember if it's written in a way that supports that interpretation or not. [IIRC, the main part says four years, another part says five years, and a third part says six years.]
Actually, I am confused on this too. The wording of the CBA 'during an uncapped year' states that restricted tenders may be applied to any 4 or 5 yr player, thus making him an RFA.
The Panthers are making both Charles Johnson (4 years) and DeAngelo Williams (5 years) both RFA's, as of today. Of course that may eventually change based on whatever new rules the latest CBA entails.
Bottom line is that I doubt Sidney Rice is an unrestricted free agent, and I'm sure that Minnesota will be putting RFA tenders on all of their 4 and 5 year guys.
It's obviously complicated like you said, or else guys like Lamar Woodley would be getting high RFA tenders too--instead of making 10 million + under the franchise tag. Come to think of it, why is someone like him getting the tag when they could have just made him an RFA with the highest tender, and saved a lot of money?? Does everyone not believe in this rule? It seems as though they could be saving a ton of money, while still locking up Woodley (4 years) at a high tendered RFA rate? (Just using him as an example, I am sure there are more)
EDIT: It seems as though there is some risk involved, as the teams that place the RFA tenders are hoping that the 'new' agreement doesn't push UFA's back to 4 yrs. If it somehow did, then guys like Woodley would have been UFA's this year. I'm wondering if the issue hasn't already come up, and the Panthers don't know something that we do not. In that case, Pittsburgh will have 'wasted' their franchise tag--although they didn't want to risk losing an important player.