tanked_as_usual
Banned
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2007
- Messages
- 4,982
- Reaction score
- 0
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I am dead set on OLB with #23. I was thinking Matthews is probably the best bet there as well since most other candidates are DE to OLB projects. Comparing Matthews to Vrabel is far fetched though. Vrabel played DE in college, weighs 20 lbs more, and has far less question marks.
I am dead set on OLB with #23. I was thinking Matthews is probably the best bet there as well since most other candidates are DE to OLB projects. Comparing Matthews to Vrabel is far fetched though. Vrabel played DE in college, weighs 20 lbs more, and has far less question marks.
I just hear Mel Kiper on ESPN saying that Clay Matthewsreminds him of Mike Vrabel. He said it 3 times or more.
So if the God of draft gurus says that Matthews is another Vrabel, is there any doubt as to what the Patriots should do.
Hey, does Clay Matthews remind anybody of Wayne Chrebet?
Hey, does Clay Matthews remind anybody of Wayne Chrebet?
More like a PATSNUTMe post in his babes forum...not that there's anything wrong with that!Hey, does Clay Matthews remind anybody of Wayne Chrebet?
Hey Box could i have your opinion. Who would you rather have Matthews or Sintim. I would rather take Sintim myself.More like a PATSNUTMe post in his babes forum...not that there's anything wrong with that!
Where did you get that garbage. Sounds like your quoting a draft guide or article. If so, please state the article or publication.
This from NFLDRAFTSCOUT:
Analysis
Positives: Ascending player who may be just scratching the surface of his potential. Well-built athlete whose dedication in the weight-room is obvious in his physique. Reliable open-field tackler. Versatile defender who flashes as a natural pass rusher off the edge. Good speed upfield and has the balance and burst to redirect his rush. Good initial hand punch to pop the blocker and disengage. Good effort and speed in pursuit. Instinctive defender who played well in space as a traditional linebacker. Excellent special teams player. Twice named co-special teams player of the year (2005, 2006). Excellent bloodlines. Father, Clay, played 19 seasons at linebacker and made the Pro Bowl four times. Uncle, Bruce, made the Pro Bowl 14 times and was inducted into the Hall of Fame in 2007. Grandfather, also named Clay, played for the 49ers in the 1950s. Pac-10 Academic All-American with a 3.06 GPA in international relations.
Negatives: Has less than a full season as a starter and only 10 career starts -- all in 2008. Surrounded by so much talent at USC that holes in his game could have been disguised. Lacks the bulk to remain at defensive end. Prefers to run around blocks rather than take them on. While he improved as the year went on, remains a work in progress in disengaging from blocks. Suffered broken left thumb against Nebraska, then fractured a metacarpal later in season, then had to have surgery after the bowl game as it did not heal properly.
I can also quote Pro Football Weekly and Lindy's Draft guides that have none of that garbage about him- just the opposite.
Hey, does Clay Matthews remind anybody of Wayne Chrebet?
He looks more like He-man
I dunno, but Josh Freeman definitely reminds me of guys like Donovan McNabb and Vince Young.
I like Mathews, he gets to the ball,,
But what I am hearing about English sounds better, and fits the size/ shape of a Pats LB. Comparisons to Lamarr Woodley, works for me.
sure.......woodley.......except that matthews is 20lbs lighter.........but that's a minor detail
sure.......woodley.......except that matthews is 20lbs lighter.........but that's a minor detail
I just hear Mel Kiper on ESPN saying that Clay Matthewsreminds him of Mike Vrabel. He said it 3 times or more.
So if the God of draft gurus says that Matthews is another Vrabel, is there any doubt as to what the Patriots should do.
If Matthews was available in the mid-to-late second with Sintim, it would be a toss up as to which is the better value for NE's Linebacker Corps. Sintim is a 'what you see is what you get' OLB who might work out better inside. Matthews isn't as strong at the point of attack, but his athleticism makes him a great Special Teams value and former Safety experience does give BB options with defensive scheme changes.Hey Box could i have your opinion. Who would you rather have Matthews or Sintim. I would rather take Sintim myself.
| 18 | 636 |
| 23 | 1K |
| 5 | 685 |
From our archive - this week all-time:
June 2 - June 17 (Through 26yrs)











