OhExaulted1
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2005
- Messages
- 5,973
- Reaction score
- 3,655
I honestly think there will be ramifications for Woody's indescretion. How can Goodell ignore his previous holier-than-thou over-the-top judgements this time? It was smack in the face of his preceived bi-partisan overlordsmanship. If he does stay true to form we will see a swap of picks in 2016. That I would be OK with. This would follow in line with two previous incidents where he has leveled punishment. Like everyone else, I want swift and decisive action. This is something he has not done in the past pertaining to tampering cases.
Obviously, the league office will remain mum on the subject, and if questioned will resort to the typical "it's being investigated internally" sort of answers. To tell the truth, the worst thing that could happen with regards to a ruling in our favor now is if he did get fired. Then a new commish could come in and arbitrarily dismiss this case without the anchor of previous cases impeding his decision. For us, right now, the best thing is is if this current douchebag remains employed.
The precedence set so far is:
a)2008-SF tampered with a Chi player (specific-L.Briggs) SF relinquished its #70 pick to CHI and was given back pick #75 in the 3rd RD while forfeiting it's 5th Rd pick (#142) outright. (Interestingly CHI held the #143 pick, which turned out to be #142 in lieu of the forfeit). They accused SF of contacting Drew Rosenhaus (Briggs agent) about possible interest. Apparently Rosenhaus threw them under the bus
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3310056
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/...559_1_lance-briggs-bears-permission-tampering
b)2011-Gunther Cunningham comments on 02/14/2010 led to tampering charges (no specified player(s)
Although Detroit regained it's 7th Rd pick in an appeal, they still had to swap #140 for SF's #154. In an interesting sidebar Detroit traded up with Seattle to aquire #57 (RB Mikel Leshore)
Obviously, the league office will remain mum on the subject, and if questioned will resort to the typical "it's being investigated internally" sort of answers. To tell the truth, the worst thing that could happen with regards to a ruling in our favor now is if he did get fired. Then a new commish could come in and arbitrarily dismiss this case without the anchor of previous cases impeding his decision. For us, right now, the best thing is is if this current douchebag remains employed.
The precedence set so far is:
a)2008-SF tampered with a Chi player (specific-L.Briggs) SF relinquished its #70 pick to CHI and was given back pick #75 in the 3rd RD while forfeiting it's 5th Rd pick (#142) outright. (Interestingly CHI held the #143 pick, which turned out to be #142 in lieu of the forfeit). They accused SF of contacting Drew Rosenhaus (Briggs agent) about possible interest. Apparently Rosenhaus threw them under the bus
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3310056
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/...559_1_lance-briggs-bears-permission-tampering
b)2011-Gunther Cunningham comments on 02/14/2010 led to tampering charges (no specified player(s)
Although Detroit regained it's 7th Rd pick in an appeal, they still had to swap #140 for SF's #154. In an interesting sidebar Detroit traded up with Seattle to aquire #57 (RB Mikel Leshore)
- #57: Seattle → Detroit (D). Detroit acquired this pick from Seattle in exchange for Detroit's third- (#75) and fourth-round (#107) selections. In addition the clubs swapped fifth- and seventh-round picks, with Detroit getting pick 157and pick 209 and Seattle receiving pick 154 and pick 205.[source 11]
- #154etroit-Seattle: Seattle selected Richard Sherman with this pick. That's right. Seattle obtained Richard Sherman through a trade with Detroit as a direct result of there draft positioning through the KC-Det tampering scandal. No ****.
- I'm gong to use the DraftTek Trade Value Chart as my guide, there are many but based on the #1 pick at 3000 pts they really are all roughly the same.
- http://www.drafttek.com/NFL-Trade-Value-Chart.asp
- CHI received 30 Pts in draft capital (#70 instead of #75). SF lost 65 Pts in draft capital (The CHIreward can be considered more if you include the fact they had the next pick after SF had to forfeit #142 (35 points)
- Richard Sherman aside, KC only recouped 6.2 Pts of draft capital for the indescretion.