PATRIOT64
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2006
- Messages
- 3,773
- Reaction score
- 0
Wrong, fat and annoying..... That makes him like what, 70%-80% of the posters on this forum?
And I am sure you fall right into that 70-80% range as well....
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Wrong, fat and annoying..... That makes him like what, 70%-80% of the posters on this forum?
And I am sure you fall right into that 70-80% range as well....
Man, that is the kiss-o-death for the Colts.
Have any of Whitlocks prognostications turned out?
The last month of the 2007 season, the Patriots were mentally drained, and they weren't a great team. The team we saw at the end of last season is the team we will see this season. The Pats are still tired.
Brady having one the greatest playoff games in NFL history against the Jags and winning the AFC Championship game wasn't great?
Not to mention being 35 seconds away from winning the Super Bowl?
Dumb column. Sure he can make his predictions, but saying the AFC Super Bowl representative did not play a great final month of football is just a flat out contradiction.
Like how he makes a point to say last season will effect the Pats this season, yet fails to mention the Colts being beat by a LT-less, Billy Volek led Chargers team at home without winning a playoff game. Not to mention Manning, Freeney, Sanders and Harrison are all dealing with injury/surgery.
Not everyone thinks like a Pats homer. Thats the beauty of it. If the Pats fail to advance far in the playoffs this season people like him can say "see I told you so, I called it back in August." And many will be picking the Pats and trashing the Colts as usual coming up so it all evens out.
If he picked the Pats to have a great season coming up or a SB win you would be praising him.
Don't let it get to you.
The fact that he said a Super Bowl representative did not have a great final month of football makes absolutely no sense and is ridiculously nonsensical.
How do you take a sportswriter seriously who thinks he has tell people how smart he is by saying every NFL GM reads his column.
Thats what I always disliked about this guy, he writing is as if the NFL is about him.
Actually he does say.
He thinks the Colts will win because "that's what he thinks." Sounds quite analytical to me!!!
Has anyone noticed the three themes of this decade from sports writers?
Pats suck.
McNabb is a winner except when he's injured and losing.
The five "one and done's" by the Colts are the flukes. The one SB isn't.
I am not sure this "logic" is even better than the Chargers winning it all because they match up so well against the Pats.