- Joined
- Sep 9, 2008
- Messages
- 32,634
- Reaction score
- 23,169
I guess we will have to agree to disagree on injury prone and bb should have a crystal ball and know everything.
Btw, gronk started his first 46 games and 2 full seasons. And now has played part of 2 seasons. So I wouldn't categorize him injury prone yet
Whether you agree with Deus or not, one thing that I do believe is that the position should have been addressed a bit more. It was great that we went with a youth movement for the future, but for this specific year we should have had a better blend of experience to add to that youth.
Once Hernandez was arrested in the 3rd week of June, and Gronk had just had his upteenth surgery a few weeks prior that pretty much guaranteed that he'd be missing time into the season too, something should have been done to improve the receiving situation.
That left us without Welker, Hernandez, Gronkowski, Woodhead, Llyod, etc and replaced them with Amendola/Edelman + a bunch of rookies and castoffs. It was great to see them overachieve and remain highly competitive, but it also left us very susceptible to even ONE injury, let alone the usual norm around here of just about everyone getting beat up.
Once Gronk went down we were screwed. As good as the running game looked, once you get into the deeper rounds of the postseason, you aren't likely to be facing bottom 10 ranked rush defenses anymore like BUF/IND. The lack of receiving options was a weakness that just couldn't be overcome.