- Joined
- Oct 16, 2007
- Messages
- 1,819
- Reaction score
- 2,007
The fact is that they had a realistic chance to win four of the five games they lost. When you lose by 1 or 3 (or even 7) points, you can't point to any one player or player as the reason. They simply haven't made the plays when they had the opportunity to do so.
It really comes down to a lack of urgency, focus and concentration. The difference between winning and losing is razor thin. Any single play can make the difference. The problem is you don't know when the opportunity to make that play will present itself, so you have to assume that every play represents that opportunity.
Whether or not they know how to win is a semantic discussion that isn't all that meaningful to me. What's important is that they haven't won. They've been close, but that hasn't been good enough. No point in assigning blame -everybody has to play (and coach) better.
It really comes down to a lack of urgency, focus and concentration. The difference between winning and losing is razor thin. Any single play can make the difference. The problem is you don't know when the opportunity to make that play will present itself, so you have to assume that every play represents that opportunity.
Whether or not they know how to win is a semantic discussion that isn't all that meaningful to me. What's important is that they haven't won. They've been close, but that hasn't been good enough. No point in assigning blame -everybody has to play (and coach) better.
Last edited: