tanked_as_usual
Banned
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2007
- Messages
- 4,981
- Reaction score
- 0
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.he is pretty bad against decent defenses
he is almost a rookie. has played 12 games. stop making knee jerk reactions. brady threw 4 INTs against denver when he faced them the first time. again ..not comparing him to brady's abilities but the team as a whole laid an egg today and pitts D has made established QB's look bad.
he could get better against them..
he is still learning..
maybe he wont be a pro bowler but he could be a very serviceable QB in the league
Come on! One bad game doesn't really mean much of anything. Remember how bad Brady played vs. the Steelers in the first game of 2004?
you know, if the patriots do make it in the playoffs, they can be a very dangerous team, because almost all of their games lost was due to droped passes.
I'm not making knee-jerk reactions.......
I have stated from the first moment that the pats are better off with o'connell
and no, cassel is not the only problem, but the comparisons to brady are ridiculous......don't even go there
The comparisons to Brady are ridiculous, but so is this thread.
This is a very different game if one doesn't have the fumble on the kickoff. We went from being down 3 to being down 10.
Give a defense like Pittsburgh even that type of a lead and its very difficult to dig yourself out of that hole, especially in conditions like today.
The comparisons to Brady are ridiculous, but so is this thread.
I'm not making knee-jerk reactions.......
I have stated from the first moment that the pats are better off with o'connell
and no, cassel is not the only problem, but the comparisons to brady are ridiculous......don't even go there