SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Well, if they want him, they'd better move on it. Chicago's been sniffing around him too, because of their linebacker problems.
I'm not familiar with Brooks' game. Is he a Willie McGinest lite? A Roosevelt Colvin? Who is he like?
QB12
He is a Mayo-lite.
Reduced calorie.
Sorry. Couldn't resist.
If it will help, sign him immediately. Our defense looked woeful on Monday.
He is a reduced calorie Mayo-lite.
Sorry. Couldn't resist.
Hold the Tuna.
On Wheatley, not Wilhite.
With a dark Bruschi.
Hold the Tuna.
On Wheatley, not Wilhite.
With a dark Bruschi.
Only 12 teams gave up fewer yards. No the Bills aren't an offensive juggernaut and we looked bad on some plays but woeful is going way overboard especially considering we would have looked even better without the Wilfork and Thomas bad calls.woeful is a huge overstatement. Fans and media went into the game expecting the d to be bad so it was a self fullfilling prophecy. But they gave up 17 points to an offense that still had owens and evans at reciever. They were not able to implement much going against the no huddle, plus they lost mayo who would of done a better job with all the underneath stuff buffalo threw. The secondary did a good job too. The d will get better.
If he can still play the run and pass well, what the heck.
My only concern is his size. 6-0 235? hes had a great career but not sure how his size (pats employ 6-1 245-250ish for ILbs) would adversely effect his ability to play in this defense (take on guards, etc).