- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 5,511
- Reaction score
- 2,299
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I should have known. The only articles I automatically write off are Bleacher Report stories. They are consistently awful.
That website looks like a complete rip-off of ESPN's website. Click on their front page.
Seymour is great when healthy, injured too often, and therefore overall has been overpaid on his current contract.
He is not a coverage guy. He struggles to stay with receivers and finds himself out of place too often.
I think injuries have robbed Seymour of his explosiveness and we probably will never see the Seymour of old again.
Seymour is great when healthy, injured too often, and therefore overall has been overpaid on his current contract.
Seymour is great when healthy, injured too often, and therefore overall has been overpaid on his current contract.
I think injuries have robbed Seymour of his explosiveness and we probably will never see the Seymour of old again.
He has played the following in 8 yrs: (not in any order)
16 games
16 games
15 games
15 games
15 games
13 games
12 games
09 games
A couple of those seasons he was held out at the end for playoff purposes, so he missed a game. Basically the ONLY season he was really hurt was the one in '07, when he was PUP'ed, and they were extremely cautious with their #6th overall pick.
Your analysis is unfair as he has played a total of 85% of his games--94 out of a possible 111
If you need any other reasons as to his importance of the team, I have listed at least 6 or 7 a few pages earlier in this thread
The article was ripped off from here.
Evauluating the NFL's Most Overrated and Underrated Players on Defense | Bleacher Report
He has played the following in 8 yrs: (not in any order)
16 games
16 games
15 games
15 games
15 games
13 games
12 games
09 games
A couple of those seasons he was held out at the end for playoff purposes, so he missed a game. Basically the ONLY season he was really hurt was the one in '07, when he was PUP'ed, and they were extremely cautious with their #6th overall pick.
Your analysis is unfair as he has played a total of 85% of his games--94 out of a possible 111
If you need any other reasons as to his importance of the team, I have listed at least 6 or 7 a few pages earlier in this thread
I think injuries have robbed Seymour of his explosiveness and we probably will never see the Seymour of old again.
His 8 sacks last year would seem to dispute that oh so clever comment. Especially considering his first responsibility is to stop the run and eat up blockers.
At the beggining of 2008, I agreed with you. Last year, IMO, was the best year of his career. He was utterly dominant.
By this do you mean the Seymour of 2008?