- Joined
- Oct 10, 2004
- Messages
- 33,218
- Reaction score
- 44,411
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.after reading Mr. Optimistic To Moss's sunny outlook for tomorrow's game ,I think I'll go down the road to the Atlantic Ocean and tear my ticket to shreds, jump in and swim to South America and take up soccer as a fan...krist
you do realize if you become soccer fan you have to riot every game right? you're not up to that
anyone who doesn't want the #1 seed in the playoffs is on crack. All playoff games at home where brady is unbelievable? or go on the road where the pats struggle...hmmm
But look over the list of recent Super Bowl winners and if the crack isn't too powerful, count how many were the #1 seed.
Seeing as we have never seen this team make a SB without a bye (1 or two)...says just how important they are to this team.
No one would rather want the #6 seed over #1....stupid
you can scroll till the 29th min and listen for the only 2 mins. thats all it is...
in summary king asked eisen what is the story of the season in his opinion and eisen waxes poetic that its peyton manning. they are ging to be #1 seed and teams which he will see in the playoffs are not nearly equipped to beat him like the ravens were last yr. That he needs 6 TDs to break the record which king says he might have by halftime vs SD on thursday. Eisen concurs that manning has been a monster on Thursday night games on NFL network and they would love to have him on their set after the win and how is like michael jordan right now in terms of wanting to win it all etc etc..
All this before the Thursday night game and we know what happened...Both look incredibly stupid :-D. As Reiss says, current media is obsessed with the end game before everything is played out.
^^^^^^^^^this, we need the bye bad.
if the pats are making the SB this year..it's with the #1 or #2 seed
100% agree, the only way we will make it is with a bye.
Seeing as we have never seen this team make a SB without a bye (1 or two)...says just how important they are to this team.
No one would rather want the #6 seed over #1....# 3 over # 1 ect
Just becasue recently teams that have been wildcard teams have won..doesn't mean you would rather want 5-6 then 1
Under Belichick and Brady, the Pats been in the playoffs three times without a bye. One time the Pats were leading in the AFCCG with 1:02 left in the game and gave up a TD because a bogus call (face guarding call on Ellis Hobbs which isn't even a foul in the NFL) put the Colts on the one yardline. I don't know if that is good enough sample size to determine this team needs the bye.
I still believe it is all about getting hot in the playoffs. Most of the Super Bowl winners over the last decade were not the best team in the NFL. In fact, many of them barely even got into the playoffs. They just got hot at the right time.
I don't want the 6 seed because they have a better shot to win the Super Bowl that way. But all I care about is them getting in and getting hot around playoff time.
More manning *** kissing
What we learned: Flawed Broncos still AFC favorites - NFL.com
not sure how he claims that every other AFC team is more flawed than denver.
With Gronk now gone. Not many are sold on the pats given their recent struggles of falling behind big in games. Denvers D sucks. But they still have a good O that can score at any point.
Manning in the cold FTW
Sold?
Under Belichick and Brady, the Pats been in the playoffs three times without a bye. One time the Pats were leading in the AFCCG with 1:02 left in the game and gave up a TD because a bogus call (face guarding call on Ellis Hobbs which isn't even a foul in the NFL) put the Colts on the one yardline. I don't know if that is good enough sample size to determine this team needs the bye.
I still believe it is all about getting hot in the playoffs. Most of the Super Bowl winners over the last decade were not the best team in the NFL. In fact, many of them barely even got into the playoffs. They just got hot at the right time.
I don't want the 6 seed because they have a better shot to win the Super Bowl that way. But all I care about is them getting in and getting hot around playoff time.
Sold? I'm not sure I am seeing this unbridled optimism you are seeing (or, more accurately, imagining??). There are 3 games left in the season and then the Patriots will be playing in the playoffs.
So ok. Maybe, just maybe, the loss of Gronk will sink the Patriots. But is it homer glasses to believe the Patriots may put together a formula that gives them a shot? Is it homer glasses to look at the history of BB's Patriots to see they frequently find a way to be competitive no matter the circumstance? Have you noticed during some ugly moments this season when the Patriots were depleted personnel wise they made every game competitive?
If you want your fan-dom to be based a lack of hope? Have at it. What purpose that serves you considering you (and no one else) knows how the Patriots will play in the playoffs. I choose to see that unknown and be cautiously optimistic. I cannot even fathom taking the bleak view while investing so much time into the fan-dom.
Just to be crystal clear, especially after posting what will be deemed by some as a negative nancy post (although there's not a word that isn't true), it's just the debate between the bye week vs having to win one game at home to play in the AFCCG that is the argument.
There's not necessarily any pessimism involved, just what seems to be reality and common sense. Sure, none of us are going to "give up" or doubt that the team can make a run even if they don't get the bye, but if we're being totally honest with ourselves and our chances, having the bye makes it a 100% totally different ballgame, as our odds would literally shoot up dramatically.
This isn't the year to do the whole "other teams have done it before" dance. Other years, sure...this 2013 year, no.