SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.True but the judge from what we read wants a settlement badly and he is going to rip NFL a new one if they dont stand down from 4. And nfl wont care. For them its some number .Would be great if they dont stand down. They will blame the judge and offer a reduction after the judge badgers them next wednesday. Then its onto the courts.But this is all assuming the NFL even offers 1 or 2 games. What if they don't? People better not blame Brady.
Curran is forgetting that this isn't only about winning and losing football games.
As somebody said before the most recent Super Bowl -- it's about honor.
Why in the hell would you cut a deal if you did nothing wrong? Brady has the means and the team to fight this crap.
I think its one thing for anyone outside to comprehend anything but exoneration , its another for the man himself to be in front of a judge who tells him to settle or take a chance of losing 4 games. Its not easy when one's ownself has to make the call and decision. I think that is curran's point. If NFL offers 1 game then brady refuses what does the judge do about it .? Does he think one party was willing to settle and others arent.
I hate to even imagine if brady thinks of even paying a fine (as Steph Stradely said, not sure why goodell is big on fines which anyways go to charity like he did in the bountygate case) but the reality may be different in front of the judge and when brady himself has to make a call. I dont envy his position tonight and tomorrow however strong a case the NFLPA has.
A judge has to be somewhat sensitive to the fact that sometimes the defendant is innocent. If he isn't then he needs a new job. I understand this comes down to the process or how the CBA is interpreted but if a judge finds this process "fair" then so be it. Brady could and should appeal the decision and file for an injunction.