Welcome to PatsFans.com

Calling out He Ban Me

Discussion in 'Visiting Locker Room' started by godef, Nov 15, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. godef

    godef Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    3,118
    Likes Received:
    6
    Ratings:
    +6 / 0 / -0

    Hey He Ban Me, how incredibly stubborn you are, insisting in various threads (this one in particular) that the Colts are still #1. Allow me to explain a few things to you.

    You see, a few years ago the Patriots faced the Colts in the play-offs without two premier defenders at the time: Ty Law and Richard Seymour. Not to mention Tyrone Poole. The results? The Colts still could not win; the Pats held them to 3 measely points, totally dominated the 2nd half. Then they went on to win the championship in Pittsburgh, still without Law and Seymour.

    During the regular season that same year, the Pats played stretches of games without their #1 receiver at the time, Deion Branch. How did they respond? They kept winning.

    In fact, in 2003 and 2004, they Patriots broke records for "man games" lost due to injury while still managing winning records. And we're not talking about 9-7, we're talking about 14-2 each season. Including the longest winning streak in NFL history.

    Last season in the AFCC, despite missing Rodney and Junior, and in a hostile stadium, we came up only a minute short of a return to the Super Bowl.

    But now when the Colts lose some players to injuries, what happens to them? Besides all the whining, that is?

    Sanders goes down last year, and suddenly the run defense SUCKS. The worse in NFL history.

    They lose a couple of receivers this year, and suddenly Peyton Manning SUCKS. 6 interceptions IN ONE GAME!

    Does a pattern begin to emerge here? On top of everything else, what makes the Patriots the better team is their DEPTH. On the other hand, the Colts have no DEPTH. We lose a few "key" players, but the machine rolls on; perhaps we lose a game, but we win many more. But the Colts, the flashy machine they are when they're healthy, if they lose a few key players, it all grinds to a screeching halt. Consecutive losses. The football world now sees what a fragile, shallow team the Colts really are.

    Injuries are part of the game, get used to it. The better teams have the DEPTH to help absorb such injuries. Which makes the Patriots hands down the better team than the Colts. The Colts always wear down as the season goes on, starting their seasons undefeated, but crawling into the postseason. In contrast, the Patriots always gain steam as a season rolls on (which should really be scaring a few folks as this current season unfolds).

    And two weeks ago, the Patriots marched into Indy, and despite the noise and the heat and the fouling officials, they beat the Colts. Yes, you're right, in a lot of ways, the Colts did beat themselves: by madly rushing Tom Brady and disrupting his game, they ultimately paid the price when they ran out of gas in the 4th quarter, at which time the Pats were able to assert their dominance. There's that depth thing again.

    The Patriots are undisputed #1, not just because the Colts were riddled with injuries, but because they did not have the depth to cover for those injuries and defend their house (and eventually, their championship). For you to deny that the Pats are #1 is nothing but sheer obstinance.
  2. ATippett56

    ATippett56 Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2005
    Messages:
    9,751
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    It's called trolling, if you have not figured it out by now and the Colts clown should be banned from this message board.
  3. indycolts685

    indycolts685 Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2007
    Messages:
    623
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    Anybody that says the Pats are not number one at this point don't know much about football..
  4. Pat the Pats Fan

    Pat the Pats Fan Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2005
    Messages:
    2,857
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    Do what I do, put him on ignore.....
  5. Pat the Pats Fan

    Pat the Pats Fan Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2005
    Messages:
    2,857
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    BTW, not sure if it's the same person, but "Ban Me" on Indystar is actually bragging about how the Colts are going to win the Super bowl with more starters lost to injury than the Pats did in '03. He's out of his mind, rooting for his team to be injured.....

    http://www2.indystar.com/forums/showthread.php?t=213917&page=5
  6. PATSNUTme

    PATSNUTme Paranoid Homer Moderator Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2005
    Messages:
    15,133
    Likes Received:
    27
    Ratings:
    +30 / 0 / -0

    #75 Jersey

    He's been dead to me for a long time. The only time I get to see his nonsense is when someone "quotes" him or in this case somone calling him out in a thread title. Starting a thread calling someone out is ususally frowned upon under the forum rules, but in this case it doesn't seem personal.

    But a fast track to the Vistiing Locker Room flame forum could be in this threads future.
  7. patsox23

    patsox23 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    7,384
    Likes Received:
    9
    Ratings:
    +9 / 0 / -0

    Well and thoroughly articulated.
  8. nowayback

    nowayback Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2006
    Messages:
    668
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    and why does anyone answer bans posts? if you dont answer...he goes away
  9. everlong

    everlong Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2007
    Messages:
    5,696
    Likes Received:
    23
    Ratings:
    +30 / 0 / -0

    #12 Jersey

    I think he was just trying to get a rise out of board.
  10. NYCPatsFan

    NYCPatsFan Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2006
    Messages:
    2,402
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Amazing and detailed write-up that clearly showed the differences!! Excellent.

    To be honest, I don't care about rankings and focus only on how we do on the field. Are we on playing well enough to be on course to win the SB? That is all that matters for this year.

    That said, it angers me a lot when the experts excuse the other team's poor showing due to 'injuries' and didn't bother giving us that slack when the same happened to us.

    Again, I am least bit bothered if some expert has xyz team has #1 or 2 and us as #32. I am confident that we will prove it on the field when we play those teams. But the biased viewpoints of the experts is irritating me so much that I stopped browsing any sports site or NFL analysis on the tube unless it is mentioned in this forum.

    This site is the only source for analysis and information for my beloved Pats and I plan to keep it that way for quite some time.
  11. NYCPatsFan

    NYCPatsFan Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2006
    Messages:
    2,402
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Please don't move this thread!! Dumbos like me can rely on such an excellent writeup that proves how the Pats shut up and play irrespective of the injuries whereas other teams moan and groan.

    Maybe the thread title can be edited to remove the name and avoid any breaking of the forum rules?

    Thanks,
  12. godef

    godef Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    3,118
    Likes Received:
    6
    Ratings:
    +6 / 0 / -0

    Don't think I broke any rules. Anything that He Ban Me finds insulting is strictly contained within his own point of view. I posted in the main forum because all his remarks are found in responses to other threads in the main room.
  13. shmessy

    shmessy Maude Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    18,261
    Likes Received:
    23
    Ratings:
    +28 / 0 / -0

    #75 Jersey


    I agree. After reviewing the play on the field, the original call stands. First down, Godef. ;)

    The point of contention is regarding the point of view.
  14. Bostonian1962

    Bostonian1962 Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2004
    Messages:
    3,044
    Likes Received:
    5
    Ratings:
    +5 / 0 / -0

    That may be the post of the year. Great and accurate post. Well written.

    Not all Colts fans are like that. Ryan seems openminded. So does IndyColt, based on what I've seen so far. Anyway, LOVED THE POST. Right on the money.
  15. Tunescribe

    Tunescribe PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2004
    Messages:
    15,901
    Likes Received:
    35
    Ratings:
    +49 / 0 / -0

    #61 Jersey

    He Ban Me might be busy working with consultants and the Indianapolis Billboard Company on the new advertising campaign being developed for display on Peyton's forehead.
  16. He Ban Me

    He Ban Me Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2007
    Messages:
    1,671
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Explain where in thayt thread did I state the Colts were number 1??
  17. He Ban Me

    He Ban Me Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2007
    Messages:
    1,671
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Nice!

    :D :D :D

    That gets a triple!
  18. He Ban Me

    He Ban Me Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2007
    Messages:
    1,671
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0


    No problem guys. It has already been made perfectly clear to me, IN WRITING, that the rules here are different for "Patsfans" versus opposing teams' fans.
  19. Ice Cold Bruschi

    Ice Cold Bruschi Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2005
    Messages:
    901
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Alright, you couldn't have expected equal treatment as a troll, and a colts troll on a Patriots board no less.
  20. everlong

    everlong Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2007
    Messages:
    5,696
    Likes Received:
    23
    Ratings:
    +30 / 0 / -0

    #12 Jersey

    Compared to IndyStar for Colts fans vs non Colts fans (especially Pats fans)?

    While I took your post about the Pats to be a good natured jab you really cannot complain about your treatment here overall. You have good points on somethings but you're hardly the innocent bystander who never tries to stir the pot.
  21. godef

    godef Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    3,118
    Likes Received:
    6
    Ratings:
    +6 / 0 / -0

    In response to the post "Who is the 2nd best team in the NFL?" ...
    We-e-e-e-ll, thanks for answering your own question! Isn't that special? Do you think we're so stupid as to not understand what you implied with that post?

    Are you related to Bill Polian? ... oops! Did I blow it there? Did I just insult the little turd and get myself banned? :D
  22. He Ban Me

    He Ban Me Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2007
    Messages:
    1,671
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Colts are not done.
  23. He Ban Me

    He Ban Me Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2007
    Messages:
    1,671
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    I agree. Not complaining, I understand the rules of the exchange. Some folks are a little more sensative than others, and of course, I know this.
  24. A.C Vegas

    A.C Vegas Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2006
    Messages:
    2,154
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    "man games" are the same as man hours meaning if you are missing 4 people for 1 game then that equals 4 man games. those are mangames
  25. He Ban Me

    He Ban Me Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2007
    Messages:
    1,671
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Do you have the final numbers on "man games" missed those seasons?? Do you count ALL players on roster, just starters? IOW, what about a ST's starter??
  26. Oswlek

    Oswlek Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2006
    Messages:
    4,171
    Likes Received:
    5
    Ratings:
    +5 / 0 / -0

    I have no issue with people talking about the Colt's injuries, but I just have one question:

    Why was it whining to point out that Indy's "returing the favor" over the final 32 minutes of the AFCCG just happened to coincide with NE losing most of their defense and their top 2 RBs? It is, in fact, the truth - and the most recent matchup went a long way towards proving this to be so.
    Last edited: Nov 15, 2007
  27. The Predator

    The Predator Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2007
    Messages:
    575
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Can you make up your mind?
  28. ColtinIraq

    ColtinIraq Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2007
    Messages:
    231
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    So this is the same DEPTH that folded in the second half of the AFCCG last year? The same DEPTH the Pats fans were whinning about the injuries to?

    (and eventually, their championship). I bet that same crystal ball told you the Pats were going to win the last two Super Bowls.
  29. He Ban Me

    He Ban Me Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2007
    Messages:
    1,671
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    It was whining because when we whined, we were called out. What goes around comes around. This years squads have nothing much to do with last years. And as ColtinIraq suggests, WTF was the "depth" last year?
  30. speed

    speed Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2007
    Messages:
    425
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Calling out a Mod or are you just questioning his point of view in a thread titled "calling out"? Pass the popcorn.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page